OK - I have thought a little about this and would like others POV.
What if Weber had played St. Mary's, YBU, and Cal at full strength and at a neutral court with neutral refs? Would they have won?
Against, St. Mary's, everyone was healthy and still lost on the road. Weber had 27 team fouls compared to St. Mary's 17. Hard to beat a team on the road and with a 10 foul differential. Granted, St. Mary's is a great team and I think even on a neutral court with neutral refs, they lose this game, but it would have been much closer.
Against YBU, they were out two starters and D-Lill had the flu. YBU had experienced seniors inside playing against sophomores and freshman. Fouls were 16 a piece, but the refs did not have to "help" YBU as they had a huge lead. I think if Weber was totally healthy and they played on a neutral court, Weber wins 6 out of 10 times. Slight edge to Weber only because of D-Lill.
Against Cal, you had the best defender in the country and Weber was out two starters. Fouls were 21 for Weber and only 14 for Cal, so the refs could have been a factor. But, even if this game were played on a neutral floor with neutral refs, I don't think Weber pulls this game out. Cal's depth and size would be hard to match. Overall, better athletes in the PAC 12 (with a few exceptions).
So, in the end, I think Weber could be 18-2 now had everyone been healthy. But, they could also still be 17-3 because as much as I hate to admit it, YBU is a good team.
In any event, it is great to be undefeated in Big Sky play and Oquihrr Bucket champions!