Correct me if I'm wrong, but promotions aren't designed to cure the football program but to promote attendance to them. Their help is effectual to the extent that what is being promoted is of quality. They're not a bad thing to be gotten rid of, however. I think of them as adjunctual, supplemental, finding ways to add value to the core product. Their effectualness is highly elastic relative to the success of the core product on the field.
The right coach will cure the core program and promotions can then promote the better product and culture. So long as they are coordinated with one another and complementary, the AD promotions combined with David Hersh promotions can bring a greater wealth of creative ideas and value than either could separately. Likely synergistically.
I, too, like the rise of UTSA, and so my vote is for Sarra as well.
If Steve Coury is not taking the AD job, has he then been included on the Viks' advisory board? A member of the round table, so to speak? The is an important relation. The Lake Oswego connection is vital and I have every reason to believe they will thoroughly find satisfying their membership on building PSU athletics through steering committees the same way they would enjoy building a business, the university being just up the highway from them. :thumb:



Willamette Shore Trolley
What is good is that NB brought in many talent-laden players. We now have a team (and program) that is a "diamond-in-the-rough." A blank easel, if you will. Merci, NB.