weberwildcat2
Active member
http://www.bigskyfans.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=508&p=3504#p3504
-
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!
Almost January - Who is legit?
- Thread starter weberwildcat2
- Start date
dystopiamembrane
Active member
I like water balloons.
PortlandStater
Active member
School pride is a good thing, but what exactly has Weber St done so far to justify a #2?
ManOfVision
Active member
Why would UNC be ranked so low? I get that they lost a conference game, but overall, they've looked as good as anyone.
VikThunder1
Active member
My picks would be:
1. Northern Colorado
2. Montana State
3. Montana
4. Weber State
5. Portland State
6. Eastern Washington
7. Sacramento State
8. Idaho State
9. Northern Arizona
1. Northern Colorado
2. Montana State
3. Montana
4. Weber State
5. Portland State
6. Eastern Washington
7. Sacramento State
8. Idaho State
9. Northern Arizona
weberwildcat2
Active member
yes, the thread was just the current standing with a description of what each team had done so far.
UM and UNC look the best so far but according to Sagarin Ratings they both have 2 of the 3 weakest schedules in the big sky so far.
i hate that you can't always tell who is good and who sucks based on OOC. I find it hard to believe ISU will finish 7th-8th-9th with 8 seniors but they look like crap so far. ISU had the highest schedule rank in the conf.
UM and UNC look the best so far but according to Sagarin Ratings they both have 2 of the 3 weakest schedules in the big sky so far.
i hate that you can't always tell who is good and who sucks based on OOC. I find it hard to believe ISU will finish 7th-8th-9th with 8 seniors but they look like crap so far. ISU had the highest schedule rank in the conf.
