Big Sky Stadium Rankings

[gumption]

I found this on Bleacher Reports.
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/1746394-college-football-power-ranking-the-big-sky-conference-stadiums" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

 

[SactoHornetAlum]

The ranking for Hornet Stadium is about right. The one thing that the also omitted was there are no permanent restrooms or concession stands. Had the author noticed that, might have dropped us lower in the rankings.

 

[SJHornet]

I think we're about where we should be. Don't think NAU and Weber should be that high though. I think if we had permanent restrooms, a concession structure, and made some fairly simple cosmetic changes to the facade, we'd rank rather high. Oh, yeah... New press box too

 

[Hornut]

I knew there was a good reason for not looking at the other stadiums. Are these boosters helping with improvements? Go Hornets!

 

[josephpoint]

UC Davis #2?

Other than being a new facility just does not look like anything special

 

[just a sac state fan]

Yes UC Davis has a very nice stadium; and it is new. But we don't need no stinking stadium that can only hold 10k, our stadium right now can hold 21,195. Cal Poly, NAU, ND, UC Davis can keep their stadium. We have what we need.

 

[Hornet25]

Wonder how far up the rankings we would jump if we had permanent seating. Although I think the track around the field will still have a negative affect.

 

[SactoHornetAlum]

Wonder how far up the rankings we would jump if we had permanent seating. Although I think the track around the field will still have a negative affect.

Apparently the track at Stewart Stadium in Ogden wasn't much of a negative effect for their higher ranking.