• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!

Cupp v Marks stats

tski60

Active member
Any of you stats guys able to do a side by side comparison of receiving yards, receptions, TD's etc for Cooper Kupp and Gabe Marks?
 
Big Sky Conference:

Kupp: 46 receptions 712 yards and 7 TDS (only 5 games)
Bourne 44 receptions 616 yards 3TDs
Marks: 32 receptions 570 yards 5 TDs
Jerry Louie-Mcgee: 41 receptions 366 yards 2 TDs (only four games)
Hill 35 receptions 522 yards 8 TDs


Ordered by reception yards per game.
 
Rjones61 said:
Big Sky Conference:

Kupp: 46 receptions 712 yards and 7 TDS (only 5 games)
Bourne 44 receptions 616 yards 3TDs
Marks: 32 receptions 570 yards 5 TDs
Jerry Louie-Mcgee: 41 receptions 366 yards 2 TDs (only four games)
Hill 35 receptions 522 yards 8 TDs


Ordered by reception yards per game.

Thanks rjones61!! You would hardly know this from reading the SR articles on WSU....
 
tski60 said:
Rjones61 said:
Big Sky Conference:

Kupp: 46 receptions 712 yards and 7 TDS (only 5 games)
Bourne 44 receptions 616 yards 3TDs
Marks: 32 receptions 570 yards 5 TDs
Jerry Louie-Mcgee: 41 receptions 366 yards 2 TDs (only four games)
Hill 35 receptions 522 yards 8 TDs


Ordered by reception yards per game.

Thanks rjones61!! You would hardly know this from reading the SR articles on WSU....

:facepalm:

I completely misread your post. These are the stats for ELIJAH MARKS of NAU. Didn't know you were talking WSU. I'll take the original stats and just slip Gabe's in:



Kupp: 46 receptions 712 yards and 7 TDS (only 5 games)
Bourne 44 receptions 616 yards 3TDs
Elijah Marks: 32 receptions 570 yards 5 TDs
Jerry Louie-Mcgee: 41 receptions 366 yards 2 TDs (only four games)
Hill 35 receptions 522 yards 8 TDs
Gabe Marks: 34 receptions 301 yards 6TDS (only 5 games)


All of our wide receivers are out performing Gabe Marks. He is only #106 in the FBS for receiving yards. Is there something supposed to be important about him? :lol:
 
Based on the eye test alone after watching us play Wazzu, there is no question Cooper Kupp is a better receiver than Marks. That said, Marks is still a high quality receiver. He might be better than Bourne or Hill (debatable). He got good speed, but isn't as physical as any of our starters.

One thing you have to marvel at is the fact we have no problem sending our receivers into the middle of the field to make grabs in traffic. Most teams avoid this because a receiver isn't physical enough to meet that kind of demand.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top