bengalcub
Active member
ISU has had a new offensive coordinator and QB coach in the last theee seasons. I believe that they have had two new offensive line coaches during the same three years. Putting in a new offensive scheme during fall ball means that it will take time for the team to get up to speed, and they won't be clicking until well into the regular season. The changes if implemented should have came during spring ball.
Defensively, for the past two seasons the defensive unit has struggled massively with alignment issues. They struggle to get lined up even pre-snap. I often see players trying desperately to communicate and this can continue even up to the points that the ball is snapped.
Burning red shirts on kids that shouldn't be playing is troublesome. I am of the opinion that when you see a large number of incoming freshman playing, it is less about building the program and more about desperation.
Kramer can pay some dues now and get young kids on the field and in time you will see very young units turn very good down the road. But, having so much of it is not by design and it illustrates the lack of depth and talent in certain areas.
Idaho State needs a premier game breaker at QB. Is Gueller the man to produce the results? I am not sure. I see some amazing things but I also see a kid that struggles reading defenses, often holds the ball too long and turns the ball over at a high rate. Trouble is, I don't see any Big Sky level talent behind him. Saying this, see above. Changing coaches year after year and implementing a new scheme late.
A team that throws as much as ISU should always be loaded at receiver and they should never struggle finding a QB that has the talent and desire to throw the ball all over the field. Where is the speed at WR? I scratch my head and wonder, are these two positions as talented and deep as we have seen during the first few years under Kramer? Maybe it is nothing more than constant coaching changes.
On the offensive front, one benefit of having such a young unit on the field is that they could be very, very good down the road. But I ask myself, has this unit ever really been dominant under Kramer or was the success that they had running the ball only a result of being able to throw the ball deep?
Dean in the slot. Great idea, I hoped for that a long time ago. Now put him in motion and give him more of a chance at getting a free release. I would start him out often in the backfield and shift or motion him to the slot. If he can get matched up with a LB, I like those odds. Plus, he will be a great decoy to free up others. Defenses must account for him on every play.
Kicking game. Even with the lack of success over the years, traditionally Idaho State has almost always been elite in kicking in punting. There is no reason to ever be average to below average in those two areas.
Defensively, for the past two seasons the defensive unit has struggled massively with alignment issues. They struggle to get lined up even pre-snap. I often see players trying desperately to communicate and this can continue even up to the points that the ball is snapped.
Burning red shirts on kids that shouldn't be playing is troublesome. I am of the opinion that when you see a large number of incoming freshman playing, it is less about building the program and more about desperation.
Kramer can pay some dues now and get young kids on the field and in time you will see very young units turn very good down the road. But, having so much of it is not by design and it illustrates the lack of depth and talent in certain areas.
Idaho State needs a premier game breaker at QB. Is Gueller the man to produce the results? I am not sure. I see some amazing things but I also see a kid that struggles reading defenses, often holds the ball too long and turns the ball over at a high rate. Trouble is, I don't see any Big Sky level talent behind him. Saying this, see above. Changing coaches year after year and implementing a new scheme late.
A team that throws as much as ISU should always be loaded at receiver and they should never struggle finding a QB that has the talent and desire to throw the ball all over the field. Where is the speed at WR? I scratch my head and wonder, are these two positions as talented and deep as we have seen during the first few years under Kramer? Maybe it is nothing more than constant coaching changes.
On the offensive front, one benefit of having such a young unit on the field is that they could be very, very good down the road. But I ask myself, has this unit ever really been dominant under Kramer or was the success that they had running the ball only a result of being able to throw the ball deep?
Dean in the slot. Great idea, I hoped for that a long time ago. Now put him in motion and give him more of a chance at getting a free release. I would start him out often in the backfield and shift or motion him to the slot. If he can get matched up with a LB, I like those odds. Plus, he will be a great decoy to free up others. Defenses must account for him on every play.
Kicking game. Even with the lack of success over the years, traditionally Idaho State has almost always been elite in kicking in punting. There is no reason to ever be average to below average in those two areas.