• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

FCS computer Rankings -week 2

up for the challenge said:
We moved up in the FCS computer rankings after week 1. We went from
90 to 79 which is good. Sacramento State dropped from 93 to 99.

That is good. WE GOTTA WIN THAT SAC STATE GAME. I was looking at schedule a few minutes ago. Is it wrong of me to think we should win ALL HOME GAMES. Shouldn't we beat Simon Fraser (which we obviously did), sac state, north Dakota, southern Utah, weber state shouldn't we win all those games AT HOME
 
demian said:
up for the challenge said:
We moved up in the FCS computer rankings after week 1. We went from
90 to 79 which is good. Sacramento State dropped from 93 to 99.

That is good. WE GOTTA WIN THAT SAC STATE GAME. I was looking at schedule a few minutes ago. Is it wrong of me to think we should win ALL HOME GAMES. Shouldn't we beat Simon Fraser (which we obviously did), sac state, north Dakota, southern Utah, weber state shouldn't we win all those games AT HOME

If you believe in computer rankings than as of today we would beat Sacramento State but we would be the underdogs in the other games. That is why they play the game to see what happens.
 
up for the challenge said:
demian said:
up for the challenge said:
We moved up in the FCS computer rankings after week 1. We went from
90 to 79 which is good. Sacramento State dropped from 93 to 99.

That is good. WE GOTTA WIN THAT SAC STATE GAME. I was looking at schedule a few minutes ago. Is it wrong of me to think we should win ALL HOME GAMES. Shouldn't we beat Simon Fraser (which we obviously did), sac state, north Dakota, southern Utah, weber state shouldn't we win all those games AT HOME

If you believe in computer rankings than as of today we would beat Sacramento State but we would be the underdogs in the other games. That is why they play the game to see what happens.

I DO NOT believe in computer rankings. Cant wait to PLAY THE GAMES
 
Computer rankings are a picture of the past. We're moving forward. Undefeated at home this year!
I do recognize that it's good to move up on the computer rankings, it shows were doing well in stats during the games. But it can't predict the future.
 
Very cool. We may not be able to predict outcomes of future events, but we sure love to try. It seems like it's part of being a human being to want to predict future events. The FCS computer rankings will change week to week; so maybe by the time that we play those teams in our conference at home, the rankings will predict that we will win.
 
The top 5 Big Sky teams from the Computer Rankings this week are Eastern Washington ( 5 ), Montana ( 10 ), Portland State ( 20 ), Northern Arizona ( 25 ) and Southern Utah ( 27 )
 
I watched the Northern Arizona vs Arizona State game and the Eastern Washington vs Washington State game . Both Eastern Washington and Northern Arizona have a very good team. If we can beat one or both of these teams than our ship is heading in the right direction.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top