So this is a few weeks late but I figured I’d comment on this anyways. If you haven’t heard, Pres Gonzales followed suit with SDSU and Fresno State and raised the student fees to pay for athletics and a few other things even though the students voted against the idea. The increase adds $22 per semester onto the ASI fee. Not much for someone who works 40 hours a week. But in this recession, $22 is anywhere from 3-4 meals (maybe more) for students depending on where food is bought.
Now I’m not here to say I disagree with the increase, as I view it as something that needed to be done. My issue comes with the way it was handled dating back to pre-election. Whoever was in charge dropped the ball and got a late push to have this on the ballot so not enough support was raised to get this to pass. Then it was overwhelmingly defeated by the VOTING student body and now Gonzo raises the fee anyways.
My issues are these (in no particular order):
1) Why waste everyone’s time and effort to have it on the ballot in the first place if this was
going to happen regardless of student input?
2) This craps all over the ideology (democracy) of what this country was founded on by going
against the will of the people (students in this case). I know there are stipulations in the Pres’
charter/guidelines/ect where he is allowed to do something like this, but I think it makes him
look VERY BAD.
3) This will create a larger rift between the Pres and the student body for any future projects
that will need funding via fee increases. (LIKE A NEW ARENA!) It provides plenty of foder for
the anti-construction crowd.
4) The state is undoubtedly going to cut education funding in one way or another, so another
increase may be needed sometime in the near future due to a reduction in budget.
5) Us regular folk have to manage our budgets according to what our revenue stream is, why
should the same rules not apply to government entities (Sac State).
Anyone else have any thought about this issue?
http://media.www.statehornet.com/media/storage/paper1146/news/2009/06/24/News/Gonzalez.Approves.Fee.Increases.After.Students.Vote.Them.Down-3749054.shtml
Now I’m not here to say I disagree with the increase, as I view it as something that needed to be done. My issue comes with the way it was handled dating back to pre-election. Whoever was in charge dropped the ball and got a late push to have this on the ballot so not enough support was raised to get this to pass. Then it was overwhelmingly defeated by the VOTING student body and now Gonzo raises the fee anyways.
My issues are these (in no particular order):
1) Why waste everyone’s time and effort to have it on the ballot in the first place if this was
going to happen regardless of student input?
2) This craps all over the ideology (democracy) of what this country was founded on by going
against the will of the people (students in this case). I know there are stipulations in the Pres’
charter/guidelines/ect where he is allowed to do something like this, but I think it makes him
look VERY BAD.
3) This will create a larger rift between the Pres and the student body for any future projects
that will need funding via fee increases. (LIKE A NEW ARENA!) It provides plenty of foder for
the anti-construction crowd.
4) The state is undoubtedly going to cut education funding in one way or another, so another
increase may be needed sometime in the near future due to a reduction in budget.
5) Us regular folk have to manage our budgets according to what our revenue stream is, why
should the same rules not apply to government entities (Sac State).
Anyone else have any thought about this issue?
http://media.www.statehornet.com/media/storage/paper1146/news/2009/06/24/News/Gonzalez.Approves.Fee.Increases.After.Students.Vote.Them.Down-3749054.shtml