I'm abivalent about that one, Cub. I feel that neglecting its facilities over the past 25 years was probably the biggest mistake ISU made with regard to athletics. But I'm not a structural engineer, so I can't begin to guess how long the Dome could be made to survive with the proper "upgrades." But you're right, long-term planning is critical -- hopefully there are such discussions and plans ongoing.
I must say I have been encouraged by the recent upgrades to facilities (video board, lockerroom upgrades, softball stadium, weight room improvements, etc.) -- after 25 years of almost nothing happening, and I'm looking forward to the campaign Jeff Tingey mentioned in his newletter to replace the turf. Let me know where to contribute, I'll definitely be a donor for that one.
I'm more concerned, truth be told, about the future of Big Sky football if Montana leaves the conference. I'd have to believe MSU wouldn't be too far behind them, and that would leave Weber State as the only school that brings any fans with them to the Dome -- or really attracts many local fans. I can only see interest in Big Sky football diminish if the last of the original "rivals" left the league. Indeed, with Appy State, Montana and Villanova all looking at "move up studies," the entire future of FCS football has to be questioned.
In any event, it would be interesting for the Journal or other outlets to sit down with Jeff and Dr. Vailas and do an expansive interview on their long-term thoughts about such things as the future of a Montana-less Big Sky (if it happens), long-term plans for the Dome and other infrastructure, etc. It's certainly a story I'd read.