• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

MONTANA

talhadfoursteals

Active member
Okay, lets get it on!!

What does everyone think??

Personally, I think the Cats have a great shot at getting a W. Nobody in the Sky has looked dominant and that definitely includes Montana. There is a lot of parity in the Sky this season. Weber could easily be 5-0 right now. Lets not get to carried away though, the Cats could also be 0-5. :shock: Montana is very dangerous and if the Cats don't play their best, this game could get ugly really quick.

UM's defense has been playing pretty well, especially against the run. However, their passing defense doesn't look as tight as it has in past years. Yet, knowing the coaching staff, Weber will come out trying to establish a running game, which has its pros and cons. Personally, I think Weber should establish the passing game immediately and let Cam loose. Its time for Cam to have a great day against UM. I think he will as long as Weber limits their TO's, especially in the Red Zone.

As for UM's offense...I'm not really sure what to say. They have their moments, and when they need to score or move the ball they get it done, but it isn't pretty. Montana, has made a living off of their offensive line and runnning backs, and I can see them trying to do that again on Sat. But...Weber's secondary and middle of the field defense has been susceptical to the pass. Heaven's the Cats secondary has been making opposing QB's look like 4 star recruits. I think a lot of that can be blamed on the defensive lines inability to put pressure on the backfield. Also, the LB's are looking somewhat slow and are routinely beaten in the flats. Granted, Nick had the assignment of matching up on Julious Thomas, who isn't a normal TE. He has great speed and definite hops. Weber's defense though is about to turn the corner. The team as a whole is extremely young, and that definitely includes the defense, but they have been working hard each week and are improving.

Who has the advantages:

Defense: MONTANA...the Grizz's DL and Secondary have more experience than the Cats. The Grizz have been putting pressure on opposing QB's all season, and have a knack of getting into the back field. Even though UM's defense gets the nod, the Cats DL is getting better, they are healty, and have been putting more pressure on opposing QBs (Still not where they need to be). Also, the Secondary is starting to look a lot better. In the second half it looked as if the secondary limited their mistakes and virtually stopped the Vikings passing game. Big plays on 3rd down are killing the Cats.

Offense: WEBER...UM has weapons and can be potent, but the Cats, as long as the TO's are keep to the bare minimum, are better. Weber's OL is quickly becoming the best line in the league, and they really dont lose anyone. Yes, Halfhill, but did anyone else notice Halfhill back at the TE spot yesterday? Who took his tackle position? That may have been a huge factor in helping Weber break open the running game. Halfhill has always been a really good blocking TE and he doesn't have bad hands either.

Special Teams: TIE...The Cats and the Grizz have the best special teams in the conference. If there is a tie-breaker, I'd look at how each played Idaho State.

Intangibles: Montana...their coaching staff is more experienced and it seems there is more chemistry between the Grizz players. However, Weber has a little winning streak going and they are playing at home, which is also Senior day, that could be enough to help muster some extra motivation and passion for the team. Also, a W puts the CAts squarely on track to get themselves back into the Playoff hunt.
 
I think at this point I would say Weber's special teams are much better than Montana's. Here's hoping for a bad weather game. 8-)
 
Montana likes to turn the ball over just as much as we do, that is what this game is going to come down to. Turnovers.

Montana is beatable, but they are still a very good team, so I hope the team comes out ready to play.

My homer pick

WSU-24
UM- 21
 
I pretty much agree with you WILDCAT but I think our offense is better and our defense is worse WSU 37 Montana 34.
 
Montana is going to be tough, but they are beatable....very much so. There last second wins are nothing short of luck, but their lucky streak ends in Ogden.

GO WILDCATS
 
interesting that our D line coach from last year, Inoke Breckterfield will be on the 'other' sideline for the game....just win baby, just win...............
 
I really believe Montana has eliminated their number one threat that has haunted us the past couple years. Without their power running attack that pounded us, I don't see a major advantage that they have offensively against our defense. A spread running game isn't going to scare our front 5-7 depending on formation. I think they might have shot themselves in the foot in the matchup against us. Granted, they still have very talented weapons on offense, I think they're a power running team trying to run a spread offense. There's a reason Reynolds hasn't looked very good this year. I'm going to be bold here and predict that last week's performance has jumpstarted and electrified our talented but struggling offense. I'm expecting a surprising whooping of some Montana Grizzlies. Weber 38 Griz 21

Call me crazy but I calls it the way I sees it. :)
 
bigskychamps07 said:
I really believe Montana has eliminated their number one threat that has haunted us the past couple years. Without their power running attack that pounded us, I don't see a major advantage that they have offensively against our defense. A spread running game isn't going to scare our front 5-7 depending on formation. I think they might have shot themselves in the foot in the matchup against us. Granted, they still have very talented weapons on offense, I think they're a power running team trying to run a spread offense. There's a reason Reynolds hasn't looked very good this year. I'm going to be bold here and predict that last week's performance has jumpstarted and electrified our talented but struggling offense. I'm expecting a surprising whooping of some Montana Grizzlies. Weber 38 Griz 21

Call me crazy but I calls it the way I sees it. :)


I like the way you sees it
 
WILDCAT said:
bigskychamps07 said:
I really believe Montana has eliminated their number one threat that has haunted us the past couple years. Without their power running attack that pounded us, I don't see a major advantage that they have offensively against our defense. A spread running game isn't going to scare our front 5-7 depending on formation. I think they might have shot themselves in the foot in the matchup against us. Granted, they still have very talented weapons on offense, I think they're a power running team trying to run a spread offense. There's a reason Reynolds hasn't looked very good this year. I'm going to be bold here and predict that last week's performance has jumpstarted and electrified our talented but struggling offense. I'm expecting a surprising whooping of some Montana Grizzlies. Weber 38 Griz 21

Call me crazy but I calls it the way I sees it. :)


I like the way you sees it

Thanks, I'm glad you can see some method to the madness.
 
bigskychamps07 said:
WILDCAT said:
bigskychamps07 said:
I really believe Montana has eliminated their number one threat that has haunted us the past couple years. Without their power running attack that pounded us, I don't see a major advantage that they have offensively against our defense. A spread running game isn't going to scare our front 5-7 depending on formation. I think they might have shot themselves in the foot in the matchup against us. Granted, they still have very talented weapons on offense, I think they're a power running team trying to run a spread offense. There's a reason Reynolds hasn't looked very good this year. I'm going to be bold here and predict that last week's performance has jumpstarted and electrified our talented but struggling offense. I'm expecting a surprising whooping of some Montana Grizzlies. Weber 38 Griz 21

Call me crazy but I calls it the way I sees it. :)


I like the way you sees it

Thanks, I'm glad you can see some method to the madness.

Wildcats won't get beat unless they beat themselves.....GO CATS!!!!
 
Good luck in this one Weber fans. Like just about everyone has mentioned, Montana is beatable. I think your offense will be able to move the ball against Montana. The key, I think, to this game will be TO's and who committs fewer. Montana has been very TO prone (6 against EWU, 7 if you include a blocked punt) and they have had several in the other games. Problem is, they create a lot of TO's as well. So if Higgins comes out like a pick machine, you're going to be in trouble.

I'm really hoping Weber can pull this one out (obvious reasons).........Good luck!
 
It's been a tough year - hell, it's been a tough decade, beginning with Bobbie Ball and now a pretty inexperienced team and head coach. But since the loss to Eastern, the Griz are clawing their way through the rest of the schedule. I just can't see beating Idaho by 19 and Colorado by 23, while you did both by just 3, and then losing to you - even on the road. But, it's certainly not a done deal, this year more than most.
 
lol today on GameDay

Photo-1722.jpg
 
Da Griz said:
I just can't see beating Idaho by 19 and Colorado by 23, while you did both by just 3, and then losing to you - even on the road.
I was wrong. Congratulations.
 
Da Griz said:
Da Griz said:
I just can't see beating Idaho by 19 and Colorado by 23, while you did both by just 3, and then losing to you - even on the road.
I was wrong. Congratulations.

Da Griz, you've been nothing but a class act and a pleasure. But can you do me a favor? Can you tell AlphaGriz to suck it? :lol:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top