The younger of the gray-haired referees last night made (or didn't make) calls in the first three quarters that clearly and inarguably favored the Bengals. Fortunately the Viks were strong enough to overcome his bias. I guess that two fair referees out of three is not bad in the BSC. I have an opinion of why guys like this ref are biased but I would like to hear from you guys on the question of . . . why? I think this is a major issue in the BS and needs some dialogue.