Born2BleedPurpleGuy
Active member
Yes indeed... :rockon: @Chattanooga, Saturday. GOOOOO EILDCATS!
baller said:Why can't Rahe take a chance and bid enough to win a home game? Build it and they will come...
The other three teams in the BSC got home games. Why can't we bid as much as UND, Cal Poly & EWU?
Another example of not setting sites high enough...
:wtf: :shocking: :shocking:baller said:Why can't Rahe take a chance and bid enough to win a home game? Build it and they will come...
The other three teams in the BSC got home games. Why can't we bid as much as UND, Cal Poly & EWU?
Another example of not setting sites high enough...
Think he meant BoveeWILDCAT said:baller said:Why can't Rahe take a chance and bid enough to win a home game? Build it and they will come...
The other three teams in the BSC got home games. Why can't we bid as much as UND, Cal Poly & EWU?
Another example of not setting sites high enough...
Keep basketball on the basketball forum
talhadfoursteals said:Wildcat, I hate to say this, but you are dead wrong. It isn't about Chattanooga at all, but Weber and Cal Poly. It was all about the bid between the two conference mates. We put in the absolute minimum, I believe 35K and Cal Poly was willing to bid a lot more. It isn't like Cal Poly has more fans at their games than us, it is the fact that they make money off of their games and they have more money to spend on something like this. Our fans are mostly there because they got a waiver or a free ticket.
WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:Wildcat, I hate to say this, but you are dead wrong. It isn't about Chattanooga at all, but Weber and Cal Poly. It was all about the bid between the two conference mates. We put in the absolute minimum, I believe 35K and Cal Poly was willing to bid a lot more. It isn't like Cal Poly has more fans at their games than us, it is the fact that they make money off of their games and they have more money to spend on something like this. Our fans are mostly there because they got a waiver or a free ticket.
We didn't bid against Cal Poly, the committee already said that they were going to try to avoid regionalizing the SEEDED teams but not the at large bids.
A. Cal Poly was always going to play San Diego because of how close they are to each other and it's a cheap bus trip.
B. They were not going to play us because they said they would avoid "same conference match ups" unless they did not play during the season. That's why there was talk about Weber playing @ Montana in the first round.
C. And they were not going to send San Diego to Ogden and then send Cal Poly across the entire nation.
Cal Poly outbid San Diego, (if San Diego bid at all) not us. We were never in a "bidding war" with Poly. We got outbid by the team that they paired us with, Chattanooga. ANd it was probably because they make more money on football and could afford to pay more.
Does it suck that the 4th place Poly team got a home game and 3rd place Weber is on the road? Yeah it sucks big time, but that's the way it goes in NCAA sports. Should Bovee have taken a chance and bid really high for a home game and risk losing a ton of money because 5K or less show up to the game? No. Lets keep having winning seasons, try to increase the fan base and maybe within the next few years we can host a game.
No offense taken Tal, but I don't think I was wrong at all. :thumb:
talhadfoursteals said:WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:Wildcat, I hate to say this, but you are dead wrong. It isn't about Chattanooga at all, but Weber and Cal Poly. It was all about the bid between the two conference mates. We put in the absolute minimum, I believe 35K and Cal Poly was willing to bid a lot more. It isn't like Cal Poly has more fans at their games than us, it is the fact that they make money off of their games and they have more money to spend on something like this. Our fans are mostly there because they got a waiver or a free ticket.
We didn't bid against Cal Poly, the committee already said that they were going to try to avoid regionalizing the SEEDED teams but not the at large bids.
A. Cal Poly was always going to play San Diego because of how close they are to each other and it's a cheap bus trip.
B. They were not going to play us because they said they would avoid "same conference match ups" unless they did not play during the season. That's why there was talk about Weber playing @ Montana in the first round.
C. And they were not going to send San Diego to Ogden and then send Cal Poly across the entire nation.
Cal Poly outbid San Diego, (if San Diego bid at all) not us. We were never in a "bidding war" with Poly. We got outbid by the team that they paired us with, Chattanooga. ANd it was probably because they make more money on football and could afford to pay more.
Does it suck that the 4th place Poly team got a home game and 3rd place Weber is on the road? Yeah it sucks big time, but that's the way it goes in NCAA sports. Should Bovee have taken a chance and bid really high for a home game and risk losing a ton of money because 5K or less show up to the game? No. Lets keep having winning seasons, try to increase the fan base and maybe within the next few years we can host a game.
No offense taken Tal, but I don't think I was wrong at all. :thumb:
A. You've spent a lot of time on the FCS forum. That's fine. Believe what you want.
B. San Diego was the opponent both wanted.
C. Besides Poly has already played San Diego this season. Weird they'd let them play again in the 1st round
D. In this case regionalization doesn't matter. NCAA foots the bill so travel doesn't matter.
E. Makes little sense to give Poly a home game because of travel when you are sending a team from Ogden across country anyway.
F. It's cheap to get USD to either Ogden or SLO.
It is important to understand that, unlike the NCAA basketball tournament, not every team is seeded. In fact, two-thirds of the field is not seeded. That is done on purpose, in order to allow the committee to make pairings “according to geographical proximity“.
The committee also has the license to avoid matchups in the first round for teams that played during the regular season in a non-conference game, providing that change doesn’t result in an additional charter flight.
WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:Wildcat, I hate to say this, but you are dead wrong. It isn't about Chattanooga at all, but Weber and Cal Poly. It was all about the bid between the two conference mates. We put in the absolute minimum, I believe 35K and Cal Poly was willing to bid a lot more. It isn't like Cal Poly has more fans at their games than us, it is the fact that they make money off of their games and they have more money to spend on something like this. Our fans are mostly there because they got a waiver or a free ticket.
We didn't bid against Cal Poly, the committee already said that they were going to try to avoid regionalizing the SEEDED teams but not the at large bids.
A. Cal Poly was always going to play San Diego because of how close they are to each other and it's a cheap bus trip.
B. They were not going to play us because they said they would avoid "same conference match ups" unless they did not play during the season. That's why there was talk about Weber playing @ Montana in the first round.
C. And they were not going to send San Diego to Ogden and then send Cal Poly across the entire nation.
Cal Poly outbid San Diego, (if San Diego bid at all) not us. We were never in a "bidding war" with Poly. We got outbid by the team that they paired us with, Chattanooga. ANd it was probably because they make more money on football and could afford to pay more.
Does it suck that the 4th place Poly team got a home game and 3rd place Weber is on the road? Yeah it sucks big time, but that's the way it goes in NCAA sports. Should Bovee have taken a chance and bid really high for a home game and risk losing a ton of money because 5K or less show up to the game? No. Lets keep having winning seasons, try to increase the fan base and maybe within the next few years we can host a game.
No offense taken Tal, but I don't think I was wrong at all. :thumb:
A. You've spent a lot of time on the FCS forum. That's fine. Believe what you want.
B. San Diego was the opponent both wanted.
C. Besides Poly has already played San Diego this season. Weird they'd let them play again in the 1st round
D. In this case regionalization doesn't matter. NCAA foots the bill so travel doesn't matter.
E. Makes little sense to give Poly a home game because of travel when you are sending a team from Ogden across country anyway.
F. It's cheap to get USD to either Ogden or SLO.
A. I admit that I do partake rather often on the championship subdivision forum. But that's not where I got my information at all.
https://thesportsarsenal.com/2016/11/07/the-fcs-playoffs-a-primer/
It is important to understand that, unlike the NCAA basketball tournament, not every team is seeded. In fact, two-thirds of the field is not seeded. That is done on purpose, in order to allow the committee to make pairings “according to geographical proximity“.
The committee also has the license to avoid matchups in the first round for teams that played during the regular season in a non-conference game, providing that change doesn’t result in an additional charter flight.
Now take a look at the pairings in the first round
Lehigh @ New Hampshire - 117 miles apart
Charleston Southern @ Wofford- 198 miles apart
North Carolina A&T @ Richmond- 202 miles apart
St. Francis @ Villanova- 234 miles apart
San Diego @ Cal Poly- 312 miles apart
Illinois State @ Central Arkansas- 513 miles apart
Samford @ Youngstown State- 747 miles apart
Weber State @ Chattanooga- 1,751 miles apart
See the trend? The way I see it there are AT LEAST only two true flights on that list (maybe 3), the rest are very "busable"
B. Of course San Diego was the team both schools wanted, but the committee pairs the non seeded teams by their geographic proximity, not by who wants who.
C. From the 2nd quote I put up
"The committee also has the license to avoid matchups in the first round for teams that played during the regular season in a non-conference game, PROVIDING that change doesn’t result in an additional charter flight"
San Diego would most likely fly into SLC or Ogden, sending San Diego to Utah would create an additional charter flight for wherever they send Poly. Plus the only teams they said they were going to avoid matching up were CONFERENCE MATES who played during the regular season.
D. DO you even know the NCAA? Yes they do foot the bill and being the NCAA they are going to be AS CHEAP AS POSSIBLE.
E. Is it cheaper for them to send Poly from the L.A. Airport to Chattanooga or is it cheaper to send Weber State out of SLC to Chattanooga? Doesn't matter cause it would be cheaper to BUS San Diego to Poly than it would be to Fly Poly to ANYWHERE. Also take into account that if you took all the seeded teams out, Cal Poly and San Diego, the closest remaining team in the FCS playoff bracket to Weber is Illinois State at 1,362 miles away. The closest team to Poly aside from the seeded teams, San Diego and Weber is Central Arkansas at 1,786 miles away, the rest are over 2,000 miles away. Geographically it makes sense to send Weber, not Poly.
F Yes it is cheap to get San Diego to either Poly or Weber, but again I'm sure a 5 hour Bus drive to Poly is cheaper than a charter flight and additional bus fees (for 60+ players and coaches) to Ogden or SLC.
So again, unless you have proof, UNDENIABLE proof that what you say actually happened then I'll retract what I said. Until then I am going to go with the facts that I have read. Cal Poly missing the playoffs was the only way Weber was going to get San Diego at home.
talhadfoursteals said:WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:WILDCAT said:talhadfoursteals said:Wildcat, I hate to say this, but you are dead wrong. It isn't about Chattanooga at all, but Weber and Cal Poly. It was all about the bid between the two conference mates. We put in the absolute minimum, I believe 35K and Cal Poly was willing to bid a lot more. It isn't like Cal Poly has more fans at their games than us, it is the fact that they make money off of their games and they have more money to spend on something like this. Our fans are mostly there because they got a waiver or a free ticket.
We didn't bid against Cal Poly, the committee already said that they were going to try to avoid regionalizing the SEEDED teams but not the at large bids.
A. Cal Poly was always going to play San Diego because of how close they are to each other and it's a cheap bus trip.
B. They were not going to play us because they said they would avoid "same conference match ups" unless they did not play during the season. That's why there was talk about Weber playing @ Montana in the first round.
C. And they were not going to send San Diego to Ogden and then send Cal Poly across the entire nation.
Cal Poly outbid San Diego, (if San Diego bid at all) not us. We were never in a "bidding war" with Poly. We got outbid by the team that they paired us with, Chattanooga. ANd it was probably because they make more money on football and could afford to pay more.
Does it suck that the 4th place Poly team got a home game and 3rd place Weber is on the road? Yeah it sucks big time, but that's the way it goes in NCAA sports. Should Bovee have taken a chance and bid really high for a home game and risk losing a ton of money because 5K or less show up to the game? No. Lets keep having winning seasons, try to increase the fan base and maybe within the next few years we can host a game.
No offense taken Tal, but I don't think I was wrong at all. :thumb:
A. You've spent a lot of time on the FCS forum. That's fine. Believe what you want.
B. San Diego was the opponent both wanted.
C. Besides Poly has already played San Diego this season. Weird they'd let them play again in the 1st round
D. In this case regionalization doesn't matter. NCAA foots the bill so travel doesn't matter.
E. Makes little sense to give Poly a home game because of travel when you are sending a team from Ogden across country anyway.
F. It's cheap to get USD to either Ogden or SLO.
A. I admit that I do partake rather often on the championship subdivision forum. But that's not where I got my information at all.
https://thesportsarsenal.com/2016/11/07/the-fcs-playoffs-a-primer/
It is important to understand that, unlike the NCAA basketball tournament, not every team is seeded. In fact, two-thirds of the field is not seeded. That is done on purpose, in order to allow the committee to make pairings “according to geographical proximity“.
The committee also has the license to avoid matchups in the first round for teams that played during the regular season in a non-conference game, providing that change doesn’t result in an additional charter flight.
Now take a look at the pairings in the first round
Lehigh @ New Hampshire - 117 miles apart
Charleston Southern @ Wofford- 198 miles apart
North Carolina A&T @ Richmond- 202 miles apart
St. Francis @ Villanova- 234 miles apart
San Diego @ Cal Poly- 312 miles apart
Illinois State @ Central Arkansas- 513 miles apart
Samford @ Youngstown State- 747 miles apart
Weber State @ Chattanooga- 1,751 miles apart
See the trend? The way I see it there are AT LEAST only two true flights on that list (maybe 3), the rest are very "busable"
B. Of course San Diego was the team both schools wanted, but the committee pairs the non seeded teams by their geographic proximity, not by who wants who.
C. From the 2nd quote I put up
"The committee also has the license to avoid matchups in the first round for teams that played during the regular season in a non-conference game, PROVIDING that change doesn’t result in an additional charter flight"
San Diego would most likely fly into SLC or Ogden, sending San Diego to Utah would create an additional charter flight for wherever they send Poly. Plus the only teams they said they were going to avoid matching up were CONFERENCE MATES who played during the regular season.
D. DO you even know the NCAA? Yes they do foot the bill and being the NCAA they are going to be AS CHEAP AS POSSIBLE.
E. Is it cheaper for them to send Poly from the L.A. Airport to Chattanooga or is it cheaper to send Weber State out of SLC to Chattanooga? Doesn't matter cause it would be cheaper to BUS San Diego to Poly than it would be to Fly Poly to ANYWHERE. Also take into account that if you took all the seeded teams out, Cal Poly and San Diego, the closest remaining team in the FCS playoff bracket to Weber is Illinois State at 1,362 miles away. The closest team to Poly aside from the seeded teams, San Diego and Weber is Central Arkansas at 1,786 miles away, the rest are over 2,000 miles away. Geographically it makes sense to send Weber, not Poly.
F Yes it is cheap to get San Diego to either Poly or Weber, but again I'm sure a 5 hour Bus drive to Poly is cheaper than a charter flight and additional bus fees (for 60+ players and coaches) to Ogden or SLC.
So again, unless you have proof, UNDENIABLE proof that what you say actually happened then I'll retract what I said. Until then I am going to go with the facts that I have read. Cal Poly missing the playoffs was the only way Weber was going to get San Diego at home.
Wildcat...this all makes sense and I applaud you for your efforts. Excellent post!! And to be truthful I agree with you completely; especially on how cheap the NCAA is :lol: (I'm sorry for being a jerk and saying you are "dead wrong," that statement would only cause an angry reaction) except one point, who outbid whom. You have a rational argument, but just believe me when I say, it all came down to who bid more between Poly and us. :thumb: It wasn't a bid between Weber and Chatty. They were going to get a home game all along. But yes, Poly beating UNCO, sealed our fate. We were going to travel. Poly's bid was substantially more than ours. Weber's had to be substantial and it wasn't. My shock was that we are traveling cross country. Not the first time, right? I hope our game goes better than the one we played against William and Mary in 09.