Seattle Eagle said:Offense=B(-): I thought we had some explosive plays to keep us in the game early, but overall the play calling seemed suspect at times. Gubrud managed the game well and posted some good numbers. He'll probably be this week's offensive MVP. (33/39 passing for 435 yards, 5 TD's, no INT's and 79 yards on the ground).
Defense=D: Massively inconsistent. Poor pass rush up until the 4th quarter when we got UNC to play behind. We also did a poor job of containing their RB's on the edge.
Special Teams=C: Our kicking game is suspect.
ewueagfan said:This team seems to play to the level of its competition this year. I'm glad we found a way, but pissed that we keep coming out cold every game only to have to kick things into high gear in the second half. We have the talent to go far this season but we need to figure out how to put away inferior opponents early.
eaglesfootball said:wasn't a bad performance. we need to generate a better running game with our backs, but maybe that will come with more experience from our line. Defense seems to have taken a step back from where they were against UNI and NAU. why was Custer in street clothes?
kalm said:When you go 33-39 for 5 TD's and 514 yards of total offense and the comments are related to how you "managed the game" and "it wasn't your best" , you must be pretty damn good.
kalm said:When you go 33-39 for 5 TD's and 514 yards of total offense and the comments are related to how you "managed the game" and "it wasn't your best" , you must be pretty damn good.
Rjones61 said:It's a good think the Big Sky was nice enough to give us two bye weeks in a row! All that rest will be crucial for Montana.