• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

Redshirt Rule

SLCBengal

Active member
A new rule is expected to pass by the NCAA which would allow players to participate in up to 4 games and still retain their redshirt status...

The redshirt rule would replace the standard currently in place to receive a medical hardship. It represents a dramatic change for college football. And it appears to possess significant support. This week at the NCAA convention, student-athletes and administrators voiced approval for the proposal, which previously received the widespread endorsement of coaches.

“I don’t think it’s right for a young man to lose a redshirt over what may be a need for a team, in a competitive situation, to have to find a player to play,” said Miami athletic director Blake James, chair of the DI Council.

“Whether it’s a bowl game or a game late in the season, personally, I struggle with why we would take away the redshirt.”

Read more: ESPN: Game-changing redshirt proposal earns key support ahead of Vote
 
i could see how this benefits student athletes when the team suddenly has a need and yet the season is nearly over.

I could also see this as a way for coaches who are having a tough season to let more athletes play the last few games and test out the talent for the next season. Giving athletes more game-time reps and really more ability to showcase young talented players.
(a lot goes through a cagey young mind when then sit for a year for the 1st time in their life) This may keep some players on a roster that would have otherwise moved on.

Seems logical....
 
Bengal_believer said:
i could see how this benefits student athletes when the team suddenly has a need and yet the season is nearly over.

I could also see this as a way for coaches who are having a tough season to let more athletes play the last few games and test out the talent for the next season. Giving athletes more game-time reps and really more ability to showcase young talented players.
(a lot goes through a cagey young mind when then sit for a year for the 1st time in their life) This may keep some players on a roster that would have otherwise moved on.

Seems logical....

agree :thumb:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top