WSUfan said:
heyoh22 said:
Was surprised to see Chris Rastater (aka buzzcut) doing the Weber/SUU game, man he must live out of a suitcase.
Saw him doing the Utah State/Colo St game from Ft. Collins on Tuesday;
Then off to Seattle to do the Stanford/Washington game on Wed;
Thursday then to Cedar to do Weber game.
I actually have come to appreciate his officiating, not perfect, but he doesn't seem to favor any team ( unlike some others) and he gets up and down the court to stay with the action.
But the end question: How do you get from Seattle to Cedar City overnight? He must hit SLC or Vegas by air and drive.
Just because he refs other conferences, doesn't mean he is good at what he does.. Did you not see the game last night? I did... He was horrible on many calls...... He hates WSU..... At one point he made every call within a 10 minutes stretch
hno: ...
In my many years of watching Big Sky basketball, I'd say Chris is probably in the better 25 percent of officials we've had. The thing you have to remember about the Big Sky is that it is a "developmental" league -- for coaches, athletic directors and staff, announcers, writers...and officials. The best of the best don't stick around long. Scott Thornley cut his teeth in the Big Sky, quickly moved up to the Big 12 and PAC-12 and did four Final Fours before he retired this year. Some of the on-the-borderline types like Eric Curry (yes, I know he's everybody's favorite whipping boy, but...) get a chance to move up to the big time, but don't stay. (Curry reffed in the Big Ten for a few years before being let go.) He's back in the Big Sky, along with a couple of other leagues now.
The "best of the Big Sky," I typically find, are guys like Chris and Eric who occasionally get a taste of the better leagues and get to work an NCAA tournament game or two each year, work other western leagues like the West Coast, Mountain West and WAC, but are still "available" enough to be an asset to the league. Are they perfect? Hell no, but they develop some consistency over time, and many of them also begin to accept that they are not going on to the NBA or a major conference on a regular basis, and they lose "the attitude" that some of the younger, more aggressive officials get.
In my observations over the years, I find that coaches who obsess over officials or particular calls can lose focus and wind up costing their teams wins. It's fine to look at video after a game, write up a particularly bad performance by an official, or question a particular interpretation with the league office. I certainly have no problem with a coach calling out an official who has "an attitude," or a quick T. But coaches that obsess on officials are doing their teams a disservice. As fans, we'll always criticize officials and specific calls or missed calls. But it's always been a part of the game and always will be.
And the Big Sky will always be a mixed bag when it comes to officials: an occasional young, up-and-comer who will be gone soon; middle of the roaders who can't rise above the Big Sky; and guys who taste the top on occasion, but still have the time and inclination to be an asset to the league. I think Chris fits well in that last category.