Junctioncat
Active member
Do we hit the gas and win big, or do we sputter?
Bengal visitor said:Morgan, their best big, is out for the season with a torn labrum. There starting PG is out, has his hand in cast And Adams, their 6-9 transfer from Arizona State, is just now getting healthy and playing his way back into the lineup. They were horrible defensively Thursday night and they are giving up almost 90 points a game in conference play. Weber should score at will.
talhadfoursteals said:Also, why sign 13 kids if you are only going to play 8. With how fast the game is going, Randy needs to be playing 9 or 10 and not 8. By the end on Saturday, our bigs were totally gassed and getting beaten badly in the middle. Can't run them hard for 40 mins on offense and expect them to play man to man hard for 40 mins.
UtahPirate said:talhadfoursteals said:Also, why sign 13 kids if you are only going to play 8. With how fast the game is going, Randy needs to be playing 9 or 10 and not 8. By the end on Saturday, our bigs were totally gassed and getting beaten badly in the middle. Can't run them hard for 40 mins on offense and expect them to play man to man hard for 40 mins.
This is getting to me as well. I didn't listen to the postgame interview but I would imagine there was a quote about 4 games in 8 days. That schedule made going deeper into the bench even more important.
With the new offense I was excited to see us go 9 or 10 guys. But we're back to the 8-man rotation that I've often complained about.
talhadfoursteals said:In his pursuit for talent, Randy has forgotten that the players that fit him best are tough, blue-collar, kids. He needs basketball players and not finesse players. If you are going to play man to man defense for 40 mins, toughness matters. These kids just don't fit his coaching style. You can have all the talent in the world, but if the kid's fundamentals are limited it doesn't matter how fast the kid can run or jump. We know that the assistants aren't developing players effectively, especially in the middle. So you need kids who know the game and have "high basketball IQs." Also, why sign 13 kids if you are only going to play 8. With how fast the game is going, Randy needs to be playing 9 or 10 and not 8. By the end on Saturday, our bigs were totally gassed and getting beaten badly in the middle. Can't run them hard for 40 mins on offense and expect them to play man to man hard for 40 mins. Final thought...there is a reason why ISU beat SUU by 20: 1-3-1.
Bengal visitor said:talhadfoursteals said:In his pursuit for talent, Randy has forgotten that the players that fit him best are tough, blue-collar, kids. He needs basketball players and not finesse players. If you are going to play man to man defense for 40 mins, toughness matters. These kids just don't fit his coaching style. You can have all the talent in the world, but if the kid's fundamentals are limited it doesn't matter how fast the kid can run or jump. We know that the assistants aren't developing players effectively, especially in the middle. So you need kids who know the game and have "high basketball IQs." Also, why sign 13 kids if you are only going to play 8. With how fast the game is going, Randy needs to be playing 9 or 10 and not 8. By the end on Saturday, our bigs were totally gassed and getting beaten badly in the middle. Can't run them hard for 40 mins on offense and expect them to play man to man hard for 40 mins. Final thought...there is a reason why ISU beat SUU by 20: 1-3-1.
ISU is playing almost exclusively man-to-man. I think there were maybe two possessions where we played 1-3-1 vs. SUU on Thursday. Frankly, I would have liked to see us play more zone vs. NAU -- we were not quick enough to keep their guards out of the lane. NAU outscored us in the paint 32-18 -- and had ZERO second chance points. All of that came on penetration.