sunday said:
Since it's winter (for most of you...sorry it's 65* in San Diego today)
talk to me about the "kind of QB we should recruit in the future." From reading past posts, it seems like most teams have gone to a passing game. Do we build big bodies up front for a pocket passer and go after the 6'4" gunslinger? Or do you see more of a Vernon type QB fitting in with our system? Can you have both? Johnny Football turned lots of heads. I can see Adams providing us with many options as Mr. Heisman did this year @ A & M.
In my opinion, EWU has become the "QB-U" of the FCS over the past decade or so. Really the only other school that can boast the same QB Pedigree is Delaware. Baldwin is a QB guy, you wanna get great development and play in a system that can give you a shot at the next level, you come to EWU. The offense is completely dependent on great QB play.
With that said, we've had great success with different QB style play. Erik Meyer (2002-2005) was a very mobile QB who was extremely accurate even while throwing on the move. Matt Nichols (2006-2009) was more of a pocket-passer guy, as was Mitchell. Blankenship (2001-2002?) was another guy like that. Padron definitely falls in that category as well.
I think the only real pre-requisite to play QB here is you've got to have a great arm and you need to be able to make the throws required in this offense. If you're mobile, then that's all the better but I don't think it's as important in this offense as
accuracy and arm strength are. We probably haven't ever had a QB quite as unique as Adams is in his running ability, but I don't think that it means we will starting running the read-option or anything. That's not Baldwin's thing.