SWWeatherCat
Active member
OK, so I looked at the recent comments in the Sac St. thread about Weber's free throw shooting (or lack there of) and decided to take a closer look at a couple of aspects of it. I don't know if what I threw together makes any sense or not but as a team and per game, it doesn't look to me like poor FT shooting is hurting Weber all that much.
Before you start telling me I'm nuts, know that I would like to see Weber in much better shape when it comes to free throws and especially by certain players, and there's no question how important FTs are at the end of a close game. Still, I don't think Weber is fairing all that badly when you look at a slightly bigger picture than just team FT% or poor individual percentages.
Weber ranks 132nd overall in team FT%, 12th out of 17 against this season's opponents, and 7th out of 11 in the BSC. Doesn't sound too hot-- and isn't-- but when comparing to their opponents and adding FTs attempted per game and potential FT points per game, they don't look too shabby.
On the attached image, there are two charts, one with Weber vs ALL of this season's opponents (to date) and one vs the BSC only. The columns show team FT% and rank, FT attempted per game, potential FT points per game, and the difference in potential points per game vs Weber. A green cell background indicates the best in the column; red indicates the worst; and yellow means the value is above the average. In the right-most column, a purple cell background indicates Weber having more potential FT points per game than that opponent.
Just for good measure, the WSU players who play in 75% of the games and attempt at least 2.5 FTs per game are listed with their FT% and BSC rank.
Thoughts? Observations?
Before you start telling me I'm nuts, know that I would like to see Weber in much better shape when it comes to free throws and especially by certain players, and there's no question how important FTs are at the end of a close game. Still, I don't think Weber is fairing all that badly when you look at a slightly bigger picture than just team FT% or poor individual percentages.
Weber ranks 132nd overall in team FT%, 12th out of 17 against this season's opponents, and 7th out of 11 in the BSC. Doesn't sound too hot-- and isn't-- but when comparing to their opponents and adding FTs attempted per game and potential FT points per game, they don't look too shabby.
On the attached image, there are two charts, one with Weber vs ALL of this season's opponents (to date) and one vs the BSC only. The columns show team FT% and rank, FT attempted per game, potential FT points per game, and the difference in potential points per game vs Weber. A green cell background indicates the best in the column; red indicates the worst; and yellow means the value is above the average. In the right-most column, a purple cell background indicates Weber having more potential FT points per game than that opponent.
Just for good measure, the WSU players who play in 75% of the games and attempt at least 2.5 FTs per game are listed with their FT% and BSC rank.
Thoughts? Observations?