-
Hi Guest,
We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.
With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile. -
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
-
Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!
Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month
Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!
WSU Regents approve Martin Stadium project
- Thread starter clawman1
- Start date
Screamin_Eagle174
Active member
hno:According to Wikipedia:
WSU attendance- 27008
EWU attendance- 10750
Eastern attendance = 39.8% of WSU so... if our trustees placed equal value on athletics that WSU's board does we would be able to build a $31,840,000. facility.
Aren't Eastern students as entitled/worthy as WSU students? Why aren't any of the points Moos makes to justify the facility in Pullman applicable to Cheney?
WSU attendance- 27008
EWU attendance- 10750
Eastern attendance = 39.8% of WSU so... if our trustees placed equal value on athletics that WSU's board does we would be able to build a $31,840,000. facility.
Aren't Eastern students as entitled/worthy as WSU students? Why aren't any of the points Moos makes to justify the facility in Pullman applicable to Cheney?
BLACKFALKIN1
Active member
EWU's renovation is gonna come from private donors
FrontFive4Life
Active member
Also, WSU's facility is helped by the Pac-12 revenue sharing deal as well as more than a few big boosters with deep pockets, two things that EWU isn't able to utilize. I still like the idea of selling naming rights to the stadium. Keep it Roos Field, but <some corp who wants to pay> stadium has a nice sound to it, especially if it comes with a new video board and/or seating options.
To clarify, it is WSU paying for their own stadium... not using state dollars. Eastern has the same option; EWU regents could just as easily approve a $10m expansion in Cheney.
I still insist Eastern has the money, it's just spent differently. No intercollegiate hockey, but we have a $22m hockey arena? That makes about as much sense as paying for ice in Siberia.
I still insist Eastern has the money, it's just spent differently. No intercollegiate hockey, but we have a $22m hockey arena? That makes about as much sense as paying for ice in Siberia.
FrontFive4Life
Active member
The students actually voted for the hockey arena as part of the rec center, if you can believe that. I couldn't when it passed. The Rec is a great addition to the university, but I think the ice arena was pretty short sighted.
BLACKFALKIN1
Active member
FrontFive4Life said:
EWU has the indoor track over by the practice fields, no need for a fxckin ice rink. put that money in the fb stadum.
