Waldo2
Active member
What do these all have in common? Good and bad assistant coaches.
USU: Thanks in large part to the assistant coaches they stole from WSU two years ago, their program is coming together. Their offense and defense is beginning to click. They have a good chance at going to a bowl game this year.
BYU: Hill was fired - OC is in hot water. Their assistant coaches are struggling and thus follows the team.
WSU: Has not quite recovered from losing the top assistants from two years ago. Last year, the talent was there, but the coaching was lacking. While I really like Mcbride, he sort of has a hands off approach and demands a lot from his assistants. This approach is great when you have great people working for you, but doesn't work out so well if the coaches are not cutting it. WSU has tons of young and talented players. They need the play calling to match their experience and potential.
USU: Thanks in large part to the assistant coaches they stole from WSU two years ago, their program is coming together. Their offense and defense is beginning to click. They have a good chance at going to a bowl game this year.
BYU: Hill was fired - OC is in hot water. Their assistant coaches are struggling and thus follows the team.
WSU: Has not quite recovered from losing the top assistants from two years ago. Last year, the talent was there, but the coaching was lacking. While I really like Mcbride, he sort of has a hands off approach and demands a lot from his assistants. This approach is great when you have great people working for you, but doesn't work out so well if the coaches are not cutting it. WSU has tons of young and talented players. They need the play calling to match their experience and potential.
