Bleacher report article (nice to be mentioned, I guess) ...
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...we-want-to-move-up-in-college-football/page/2
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/...we-want-to-move-up-in-college-football/page/2
-
Hi Guest,
We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.
With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile. -
Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
-
Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!
Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month
Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!
25 Non-FBS Teams We Want To Move Up
- Thread starter HannahO
- Start date
ewunerd
Active member
And we were first mentioned! The way that FBS conference expansion is driven by TV markets, a move up by EWU isn't that out of the question if we can continue the great crowd support from the last few seasons. Actually, a move up would instantly fill the proposed stadium expansions in my opinion.
A move up would only make sense (not just for us but Montana, Montana State and others) if it were done as part of a group of the stronger Big Sky schools. And if there were enough TV monies in the deal to offset signifcantly higher costs with a move up.
A move up would only make sense (not just for us but Montana, Montana State and others) if it were done as part of a group of the stronger Big Sky schools. And if there were enough TV monies in the deal to offset signifcantly higher costs with a move up.
It will be interesting to see what happens in the next 5 years. I think that we are on the rise. I agree that we need to stay with our peers.
It is critical that we get the Gateway Project going whether it is to keep growing in the Big Sky or to be included in a future hypothetical Big Sky split.
I think one more year of 104% attendance will get us over the hump.
It is critical that we get the Gateway Project going whether it is to keep growing in the Big Sky or to be included in a future hypothetical Big Sky split.
I think one more year of 104% attendance will get us over the hump.
It is nice being a big fish in a little pond but bigger challenges are interesting as well. As long as the Big Sky stays strong as we play quality FBS programs for our out of conference games I am happy where we are now.
But just in case... will the design of the Gateway project accommodate enough seating to move up to FBS? Anybody know if other amenities are included in the project or contemplated in a future expansion to make the change as painless as possible?
But just in case... will the design of the Gateway project accommodate enough seating to move up to FBS? Anybody know if other amenities are included in the project or contemplated in a future expansion to make the change as painless as possible?
