Answering scooter's question, I really do feel like a lot of the issues with the anemic offense is on the coaches and the play calling. I have been critical on Barnum before, but even last year and the beginning of this season when this offense was racking up yards, the team squandered a lot of leads late because opponents made adjustments and we simply do not. The offense has been figured out, and it's easy to single out the QB (KM), but Ramirez and Penn aren't absolutely lighting it on fire when they are in there. I think it's more with the offensive scheme. Barnum calls no plays to help out the passing game. It's all vertical. And I have said it before, but the pass offense is best when the offense's tempo is quick, and KM has time to change plays and make pre snap reads. Has any one else noticed this? The offense seems to only move when they are racing against the clock (end of the half or when they are in a shootout like against Poly). Too many times, I have seen the offense get plays in way too late. This offense has become predictable, we need to run more routes than just deep fades to Dean or Closs in the seam.
What is encouraging is that Bruce finally called some rollouts for KM, and it was pretty successful. Maybe we can build on that moving forward with KM...
Oh wait, whose our QB? Is it KM, Penn, or Ramirez. This coaching staff needs to select a guy and stick with it. These short leashes are either making the QBs press to make plays (ints), or play conservative (3 and outs). It kills the offensive cohesion, and strips away the credibility of the QB. How are either of these QBs supposed to have a team believe in them and lead if the coaches cannot believe in them?
PS How were our biggest offensive weapons not in at the same time against UND? Did Dean, Adams, and McDonagh ever get one snap together?
In other news, I am very happy with our defense!