• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!

Athletic Facilities

He really didn't say anything in that statement other than everything is going according to plan. The things he is referring to were not defined.

Still prefer this as opposed to making any definitive statements before a contract has been signed.
 
He really didn't say anything in that statement other than everything is going according to plan. The things he is referring to were not defined.

Still prefer this as opposed to making any definitive statements before a contract has been signed.
Either way, could be a negotiating tactic? Time will tell.
 
Being admitted to FBS this year has allowed Sac State slow down and do the stadium right. Not rushed. Might even be able to increase the budget.

It explains why the school went silent on the stadium plans last October/November. The timeline shifted, but for the right reasons.
 
Being admitted to FBS this year has allowed Sac State slow down and do the stadium right. Not rushed. Might even be able to increase the budget.

It explains why the school went silent on the stadium plans last October/November. The timeline shifted, but for the right reasons.
My opinion is that this FBS invite makes revenue bonds a much easier ask. As JV, there was enough data to know that the revenue generation side of things would never pencil out. Our revenues were nearly capped at the JV level. With FBS status, the revenue generation side of the equation is much more favorable.

I hope this means the track-less on-campus option happens. I say this because I have a hard time seeing the CSU green light some revenue bonds on non-CSU owned property. Time will tell.
 
I hope this means the track-less on-campus option happens. I say this because I have a hard time seeing the CSU green light some revenue bonds on non-CSU owned property. Time will tell.
Agree 110%. Why would CSU issue bonds against a property that is not CSU controlled? Wont happen.
I recall seeing the CSU BOT has funds earmarked for a stadium replacement in 27/28.

My gut is telling me Wood/Orr is entertaining/talking to Cal Expo so they can tell the media/public they are working with CE and get everyone off their back.

Drag this out until 2027 when BOT funds are available and then reveal CE didnt work out, so now they are back on campus. And btw, the track has to stay because of the T&F programs.

Why spend $3M on current Hornet Stadium to throw it away? That is foolish use of funds.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top