Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
EWURanger said:Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
To the extent that it might take some of the ambiguity out of the selection process, I think I like it.
:+1:Rjones61 said:EWURanger said:Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
To the extent that it might take some of the ambiguity out of the selection process, I think I like it.
Yeah, after mulling it over, it seems like a pretty good idea. I just wasn't looking forward to hearing people whine for extra weeks.
tomq04 said:Why would anyone be upset? It's insight into how the playoffs are going to play out...in general more information is better.
That is why ....win out top 2 seedclawman said:As I look at the wins by SHSO and Jack St I do not see why they are ranked so high. The teams they have beaten in many cases have bad records.
EWU98 said:That is why ....win out top 2 seedclawman said:As I look at the wins by SHSO and Jack St I do not see why they are ranked so high. The teams they have beaten in many cases have bad records.
luckyintheorder said:These rankings won't matter until the season is over and this team has taken care of business. The Eags win out and there will be a top 4 seed waiting right? Guess it could be higher. First things first.![]()
KJEagle said:luckyintheorder said:These rankings won't matter until the season is over and this team has taken care of business. The Eags win out and there will be a top 4 seed waiting right? Guess it could be higher. First things first.![]()
Granted, but even at the end of the season this will mean more than the arbitrary rankings that the various polls do.
Eags12 said:Which polls do they use to determine who gets selected? Coaches? Media?