Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
EWURanger said:Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
To the extent that it might take some of the ambiguity out of the selection process, I think I like it.
:+1:Rjones61 said:EWURanger said:Rjones61 said:That would be very very interesting. Don't know if I like the idea or not.
To the extent that it might take some of the ambiguity out of the selection process, I think I like it.
Yeah, after mulling it over, it seems like a pretty good idea. I just wasn't looking forward to hearing people whine for extra weeks.
tomq04 said:Why would anyone be upset? It's insight into how the playoffs are going to play out...in general more information is better.
That is why ....win out top 2 seedclawman said:As I look at the wins by SHSO and Jack St I do not see why they are ranked so high. The teams they have beaten in many cases have bad records.
EWU98 said:That is why ....win out top 2 seedclawman said:As I look at the wins by SHSO and Jack St I do not see why they are ranked so high. The teams they have beaten in many cases have bad records.
luckyintheorder said:These rankings won't matter until the season is over and this team has taken care of business. The Eags win out and there will be a top 4 seed waiting right? Guess it could be higher. First things first.
KJEagle said:luckyintheorder said:These rankings won't matter until the season is over and this team has taken care of business. The Eags win out and there will be a top 4 seed waiting right? Guess it could be higher. First things first.
Granted, but even at the end of the season this will mean more than the arbitrary rankings that the various polls do.
Eags12 said:Which polls do they use to determine who gets selected? Coaches? Media?