• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!

EWU Turf

StungAlum said:
1) Hard to see the football against the field.
2) Hard to see the players with red jersey's and helmet's.
3) Looks dreadful.

I really dislike the field.

1) Not when the ball is moving.
2) That's the point. :D
3) Looks amazing!

Good for you! :lol:
 
StungAlum said:
1) Hard to see the football against the field.
2) Hard to see the players with red jersey's and helmet's.
3) Looks dreadful.

I wouldnt be surprised to see the NCAA make some rule changes after this season regarding turf like this, I'd be willing to bet that there are going to ba alot of complaints regarding the red against the jersey's and the football. I beleive it may give them an unfair advantage as they are practicing on the red field, whereas other teams are just going to go in there and have to adapt.

I really dislike the field.

I'm not sure if I like the way it looks either. But come on. Red helmets, red jersey's, red field a problem with the NCAA??? They approved it. what about blue hemets and and blue jersey's on a blue field. Never been a problem before. Maybe green helmets and green jersey's on a green field is a problem. Bottom line is this is going to put more national attention on EWU and the BSC. It's time to focus on Stanford. Just win baby! The time is now to step up and start winning some games!
 
Let's just hope Tennessee doesn't so the same thing some day. I don't know which one would be worse! :)
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
StungAlum said:
1) Hard to see the football against the field.
2) Hard to see the players with red jersey's and helmet's.
3) Looks dreadful.

I really dislike the field.

1) Not when the ball is moving.
2) That's the point. :D
3) Looks amazing!

Good for you! :lol:

1) Bull, just look at the pic with the ball against the turf.
2) If you need to be camouflaged you don't belong on the field!
3) Still dreadful.

Thank you.
 
Green Laser said:
How would that be any different if we were to wear all green uniforms on a green field?

Grass is green, it's a natural playing surface for football. The NCAA hasnt banned the use of green uniforms and a brown ball against a green surface is easy to distinguish. Even though the field is now artificial, it mimics real grass in both color and texture.

Red grass isnt real, it's artificial. It's hard to see a brown ball against red turf, or anythyng brown for that matter.

Boise's blue field cannot be used as an example as brown and blue cannot be mistaken, they are very different and the brown ball doesnt get lost against a blue field.

According to Screamin, the point is to be somewhat camouflaged while on the field therefore creating an unfair advantage for the home team.
 
iSac said:
Let's just hope Tennessee doesn't so the same thing some day. I don't know which one would be worse! :)

I would desperately love to see UOP and Sac alternate playing on an orange field with black stripes at Amos Alonzo Stagg Memorial Stadium in Stockton and a green field with gold stripes at Hornet Stadium.
 
Super Hornet said:
iSac said:
Let's just hope Tennessee doesn't so the same thing some day. I don't know which one would be worse! :)

I would desperately love to see UOP and Sac alternate playing on an orange field with black stripes at Amos Alonzo Stagg Memorial Stadium in Stockton and a green field with gold stripes at Hornet Stadium.
I think I saw someone post somewhere on another board that the NCAA requires the hash and yard marks to be white. I have no idea if it is true though.
 
StungAlum said:
Green Laser said:
How would that be any different if we were to wear all green uniforms on a green field?

Grass is green, it's a natural playing surface for football. The NCAA hasnt banned the use of green uniforms and a brown ball against a green surface is easy to distinguish. Even though the field is now artificial, it mimics real grass in both color and texture.

Red grass isnt real, it's artificial. It's hard to see a brown ball against red turf, or anythyng brown for that matter.

Boise's blue field cannot be used as an example as brown and blue cannot be mistaken, they are very different and the brown ball doesnt get lost against a blue field.

According to Screamin, the point is to be somewhat camouflaged while on the field therefore creating an unfair advantage for the home team.

Awww, Stung Alum has a severe bout of sour grapes. :lol:

Green fieldturf is still artificial you tard. Red is a contrasting color, big whoop. Your Sac State logo in the middle of you artificial field is also contrasting, and artificial. Green unis on a green field is also camoflage, so I guess that makes it an unfair advantage? No, NCAA hasn't banned or made a rule against green unis on green turf. Then again, they haven't banned or made rules against colored turf either, so your point is moot. We're within the bounds of the rule, and therefore it's completely fair. Quit your whining little girl.
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
StungAlum said:
Green Laser said:
How would that be any different if we were to wear all green uniforms on a green field?

Grass is green, it's a natural playing surface for football. The NCAA hasnt banned the use of green uniforms and a brown ball against a green surface is easy to distinguish. Even though the field is now artificial, it mimics real grass in both color and texture.

Red grass isnt real, it's artificial. It's hard to see a brown ball against red turf, or anythyng brown for that matter.

Boise's blue field cannot be used as an example as brown and blue cannot be mistaken, they are very different and the brown ball doesnt get lost against a blue field.

According to Screamin, the point is to be somewhat camouflaged while on the field therefore creating an unfair advantage for the home team.

Awww, Stung Alum has a severe bout of sour grapes. :lol:

Green fieldturf is still artificial you tard. Red is a contrasting color, big whoop. Your Sac State logo in the middle of you artificial field is also contrasting, and artificial. Green unis on a green field is also camoflage, so I guess that makes it an unfair advantage? No, NCAA hasn't banned or made a rule against green unis on green turf. Then again, they haven't banned or made rules against colored turf either, so your point is moot. We're within the bounds of the rule, and therefore it's completely fair. Quit your whining little girl.
Dude it's ugly and your field sucks. We will remind for years to come.
 
Hornut said:
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
StungAlum said:
Green Laser said:
How would that be any different if we were to wear all green uniforms on a green field?

Grass is green, it's a natural playing surface for football. The NCAA hasnt banned the use of green uniforms and a brown ball against a green surface is easy to distinguish. Even though the field is now artificial, it mimics real grass in both color and texture.

Red grass isnt real, it's artificial. It's hard to see a brown ball against red turf, or anythyng brown for that matter.

Boise's blue field cannot be used as an example as brown and blue cannot be mistaken, they are very different and the brown ball doesnt get lost against a blue field.

According to Screamin, the point is to be somewhat camouflaged while on the field therefore creating an unfair advantage for the home team.

Awww, Stung Alum has a severe bout of sour grapes. :lol:

Green fieldturf is still artificial you tard. Red is a contrasting color, big whoop. Your Sac State logo in the middle of you artificial field is also contrasting, and artificial. Green unis on a green field is also camoflage, so I guess that makes it an unfair advantage? No, NCAA hasn't banned or made a rule against green unis on green turf. Then again, they haven't banned or made rules against colored turf either, so your point is moot. We're within the bounds of the rule, and therefore it's completely fair. Quit your whining little girl.
Dude it's ugly and your field sucks. We will remind for years to come.

It's awesome and looks great, and I'm glad others hate it. Makes it "sting" a little bit more when we beat you on it. :lol:
 
I don't think anyone is really intimidated or jealous of this abomination. I look forward to watching the Hornets stomp the Eagles at "The Menstration Station" this year...
 
Kadeezy said:
I don't think anyone is really intimidated or jealous of this abomination. I look forward to watching the Hornets stomp the Eagles at "The Menstration Station" this year...

Kind of like last year, huh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Maybe we won't pull our starters this year and hang 60+ on the bumble bees. :D
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Kadeezy said:
I don't think anyone is really intimidated or jealous of this abomination. I look forward to watching the Hornets stomp the Eagles at "The Menstration Station" this year...

Kind of like last year, huh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Maybe we won't pull our starters this year and hang 60+ on the bumble bees. :D


Or maybe like the last time we were up there. Remember that?
 
Screamin_Eagle174 said:
Kadeezy said:
I don't think anyone is really intimidated or jealous of this abomination. I look forward to watching the Hornets stomp the Eagles at "The Menstration Station" this year...

Kind of like last year, huh? :lol: :lol: :lol:

Maybe we won't pull our starters this year and hang 60+ on the bumble bees. :D


Funny, you posted this SAME EXACT post on another forum :roll:

Stop living in the past, this is a new season and as far as I can tell, both teams have a loss at this point.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top