I apologize if my columns don't line up as I want. I hope you can figure it all out. Help me here.
TEAM RPI W - L SOS
NJIT 298 4 - 33 289
UTPA 296 12-41 244
UNC 294 14-35 215 Chicago 292 2 - 36 179
Houston - Baptist 283 11-37 195
North Dakota 264 8 - 26 127
Utah Valley 250 18-35 119
NYIT 224 19-29 251
The above numbers are the RPI’s and SOS’s from the 2009 season. These were found on boydsworld.com if you’re interested in such things. I’m sure this is no secret, but this is not too good. The lowest in the land was Coppin State at 302 and they went 0-29. Most people who follow college baseball are pulling for them to end this skid, soon. The conference was in the bottom 10%, or thereabouts, with New Jersey Tech, UT - Pan American, and Northern Colorado being the worst of the bunch.
SOS (strength of schedule) gives a fair idea of the quality of OOC as well as in-conference opposition.
Oregon 235 14-42 49
CSU Bakersfield 246 13-37 72
Check the above two teams. Why did they have such a low RPI (comparable to most GWC teams)? Simply because they didn’t win. As you can see by their SOS they certainly played tough schedules (Oregon is in the Pac10 which is very tough, top to bottom) or, as in the case of Bakersfield, were willing to take on the good teams as they were making the jump to D1. Oregon just started baseball last year after dropping it a few years back. Based on SOS, then, Utah Valley was the strongest team in the conference or, at least, played the strongest schedule. AND, they won 18 games. How do you think Oregon or Bakersfield would do in the GWC? Pretty good, I’d gather.
Let’s place them as they might have finished last year.
1. Utah Valley State 184
2. North Dakota 195
3. Chicago 235
4. NYIT 237
5. Houston Baptist 239
6. University of Northern Colorado 254
7. UTPA 270
8. NJIT 293
The above numbers are nothing more than adding RPI and SOS and dividing by two. Pretty mysterious, eh? My next posting will come on another thread.
TEAM RPI W - L SOS
NJIT 298 4 - 33 289
UTPA 296 12-41 244
UNC 294 14-35 215 Chicago 292 2 - 36 179
Houston - Baptist 283 11-37 195
North Dakota 264 8 - 26 127
Utah Valley 250 18-35 119
NYIT 224 19-29 251
The above numbers are the RPI’s and SOS’s from the 2009 season. These were found on boydsworld.com if you’re interested in such things. I’m sure this is no secret, but this is not too good. The lowest in the land was Coppin State at 302 and they went 0-29. Most people who follow college baseball are pulling for them to end this skid, soon. The conference was in the bottom 10%, or thereabouts, with New Jersey Tech, UT - Pan American, and Northern Colorado being the worst of the bunch.
SOS (strength of schedule) gives a fair idea of the quality of OOC as well as in-conference opposition.
Oregon 235 14-42 49
CSU Bakersfield 246 13-37 72
Check the above two teams. Why did they have such a low RPI (comparable to most GWC teams)? Simply because they didn’t win. As you can see by their SOS they certainly played tough schedules (Oregon is in the Pac10 which is very tough, top to bottom) or, as in the case of Bakersfield, were willing to take on the good teams as they were making the jump to D1. Oregon just started baseball last year after dropping it a few years back. Based on SOS, then, Utah Valley was the strongest team in the conference or, at least, played the strongest schedule. AND, they won 18 games. How do you think Oregon or Bakersfield would do in the GWC? Pretty good, I’d gather.
Let’s place them as they might have finished last year.
1. Utah Valley State 184
2. North Dakota 195
3. Chicago 235
4. NYIT 237
5. Houston Baptist 239
6. University of Northern Colorado 254
7. UTPA 270
8. NJIT 293
The above numbers are nothing more than adding RPI and SOS and dividing by two. Pretty mysterious, eh? My next posting will come on another thread.