up for the challenge said:
Bengals said:
Up, I think that depends on the depth of the position and there were some issues when Coach Phen took over especially at QB. I do think that by year three of Coach Phen's program rebuild he should have built most of his depth through recruiting and then fill in holes with JC/Drop down players that can fill those holes right away. No matter how well you recruit they do not all work out. Some get hurt, do not make it in school, get home sick, transfer, or just do not develop like you had hoped. That is why you will always need some JC/Drop Down help.
Bengals,
Coach Phen received 6 years of recruiting from coach Kramer and has had 1 year of signing players from last season as a head coach. Coach Phen has a full team of scholarship players and walkons. This is not a rebuild team for coach Phen. This is an experienced team that knows the program. We should be winning 500% of our league games by now if Kramer recruited and signed good players. When a JUCO or Step Down player signs with ISU that players is considered an At Need player and that player expects to be a starter. Why would any JUCO or Step Down player come to ISU to play a back up role? Why would any head coach sign a JUCO or Step Down player to play a back up role? It would be better to go the high school route and wait for them to become a junior to be a starter. I do not know about you but I would not transfer into a school to sit the bench. The head coach would have to guarantee to me that I would be a starter in the first game when recruiting me.
UP, I respectfully disagree on this topic regarding "Guarantee to be a starter in 1st game" if a player is a transfer. If a player is dropping down from FBS to FCS i would have to believe it is because he is not playing much at the FBS level, so what guarantee would a staff have that that drop down player who is not playing at FBS is better than any of his starters that are returning or any of his young players who return that are already in his program. I think its safe to say in alot of cases a backup at FBS who is like 4th team on a FBS team is not absolutely better than a FCS second or third teamer. I would say they could be equal but i would feel real comfortable sayaing that that backup FBS player is certainly not guaranteed to better than a starter at an FCS school. We return ALOT OF STARTERS and reserves from last years team so as a coach how could you absolutely say a FBS backup is garanteed to move ahead of those guys. wouldnt it be wise to tell the kid, we have most of our team returning but we want you hear and we expect you to compete and battle in practice and if you are better than the returning guys you will elevate up the depth chart. That would be the risk in transfering i would think. A JC player i would say is the same thing. I would not concede that a JC transfer is automatically better than guys already in the program and therefore guaranteed a starting spot. Now i would obviously say there is a CHANCE that those transfers FBS or JC COULD be better but they better come in and battle and compete like any other recruit at ISU should. And to answer "why would any JUCO or step down player come to ISU to play a back up role?" Well then maybe they shouldnt come to ISU if they cant handle not being guaranteed to be a starter, i would not want a player on my team who couldnt accept having to battle and compete and i would certainly not want a large amount of those types of players on my roster. Just my thoughts. Its good dialogue though UP