I don't like BSU or Idaho because I remember them as rivals. I'll watch them when they are TV but I'm more likely rooting for the team they play than for them. I don't see Boise as representing Idaho because they don't. They represent Boise as they always have, now they just have a bunch of band wagon fans who have climbed on the wagon. The issue you run into with Boise fans is most are condensending not vindictive. Most see ISU as the little brother rather than as the older brother who has fallen on hard times which is reality. This is also a problem, Boise State is ISU and Idaho's little brother, but have grown up and done very well for themselves both on the Academic and Athletic side. Boise States administration made a decision many years ago to build strong althletic programs, a policy they followed even to the detriment of the academic side for a while. This policy is now paying off. Academically Boise - In what way? They don't offer the number of programs? They actually even have better programs in some areas than Idaho or ISU, and some not as good. is the worst school is Idaho, but the people don't know that. More people tie academics to athletics, not recognizing that a winning football team does not mean the academics at the school are strong as well. ISU on the other hand has allowed a division between the academic side and the athletic side. They don't work together or help each other. The reason our athletics are in the shape they are is because of the power base at the school. Any effort to put more money into the athletics is doomed to fail because of the academic side of the university system that does not see the benifit of a strong athletic program. I'm sure that you would find Professor's at Boise who complain about the football team and athletic programs at Boise even though their success benifits there programs as well. The difference; Boise State's Presidents have stayed the path dispite having to battle the academic side. Boise States' academics are now improving and will continue to because of the success of the football team, not dispite it. The short sightedness of ISU's Presidents have led to the problems we face today. Having a bunch of AD's over the past twenty years has not helped either. Bowen liked that becasue no one person could establish a power base to work from. As long as the AD did not have the ear of all the athletic supporters at ISU, Bowen could keep doing what he wanted. That concept could also be applied to the academic side as well. Any division in the athletic programs supporters eroded their power base keeping the athletic support from ever getting strong enough to change policy. Anyone who has been envolved in ISU's or any school for that matter, know that it is a political nightmare. And unless you are willing to and able to play the game, you are doomed to fail.