cats2506 said:um flat out isn't that good, you will dominate this game. They can't run the ball for crap and your secondary is way better than MSU's, their offense will have a lot of 3 and outs, leaving their defense on the field most of the game, the blitz heavy scheme will be open to quick passes and power runs. This one isn't even close.
I expect a barnburner in the UI@SAC game, I'm picking UI with the upset unless Scatebo has 30+ carries.
cats2506 said:um flat out isn't that good, you will dominate this game. They can't run the ball for crap and your secondary is way better than MSU's, their offense will have a lot of 3 and outs, leaving their defense on the field most of the game, the blitz heavy scheme will be open to quick passes and power runs. This one isn't even close.
I expect a barnburner in the UI@SAC game, I'm picking UI with the upset unless Scatebo has 30+ carries.
oldrunner said:First off, that's the best D we have faced this year, so far. Their D is only second to ours.
Secondly, we ran the ball when everyone in the stadium, everyone on both teams, and everyone in the universe knew we were going to do it and still did it successfully against a very good D.
Our O wasn't stellar, but it was pretty darn good. Our D was very good for most of the game. STs were good, with the exception of the KO return.
I agree that the announcers for the ESPN+ coverage were less than adequate, but who really cares?
Sac beat UI on a late 4th qtr drive 31-28. Sac looks quite beatable. It will be the best O against the best D next week. Should be a good one.
SDHornet said:oldrunner said:First off, that's the best D we have faced this year, so far. Their D is only second to ours.
Secondly, we ran the ball when everyone in the stadium, everyone on both teams, and everyone in the universe knew we were going to do it and still did it successfully against a very good D.
Our O wasn't stellar, but it was pretty darn good. Our D was very good for most of the game. STs were good, with the exception of the KO return.
I agree that the announcers for the ESPN+ coverage were less than adequate, but who really cares?
Sac beat UI on a late 4th qtr drive 31-28. Sac looks quite beatable. It will be the best O against the best D next week. Should be a good one.
Shoddy play calling let Idaho back in the game, but credit to Idaho, they are the real deal this year and I expected a close game. I expect a lot of power running plays by Weber this week. Hornet running game has been phenomenal recently, but our passing attack has been faltering. Should be a good game, Weber is the only BSC program Taylor has not beaten...Weber is also the only BSC loss. No road BSC losses under Taylor and no wins over Weber under his tenure, something has to give this week. This game will be worth the price of admission.
Well, allrighty then. Sac gets to experience what we experienced at MSU. It will make this game even more interesting. We will get a little experience to practice in it over the next few days. :kisswink:Chex said:SDHornet said:oldrunner said:Sac beat UI on a late 4th qtr drive 31-28. Sac looks quite beatable. It will be the best O against the best D next week. Should be a good one.
Both the Wildcats and Hornets have come a long way since Jody Sears served as coach. It should be a very tightly contested game. Early weather forecast calls for rain/snow mix and a high of 45 degrees.