up for the challenge said:If that is the case than why would the "University of Idaho" and Coach Petrino sign 16 JUCO's and only sign 7 high school players in 2014 while on APR probation? The only reason that I can think of is that the "University of Idaho" must feel confident that these JUCO players will perform well in the classroom, will graduate, and will help the Vandals win in 2014 and 2015. If you feel that the "University of Idaho" is taking a risk based on JUCO's transfers having a lower graduation rate compared to high school recruits based on NCAA figures than that is your opinion but it is not the opinion of the "University of Idaho" and Coach Petrino as they did sign 16 JUCO's in 2014 while on APR probation. Their objective is to win immediately and to correct their APR problems.
All I have is theories but here they are: Idaho is willing to take a risk signing JUCO players because they realize they have to start winning soon in order to maintain the support they need to remain FBS. A few more 1-11 seasons and even the Sun Belt will send them packing. Idaho State, on the other hand, has chosen to take a longer term approach by building largely with freshmen. Not all freshmen,mind you -- as I have noted many times, ISU has actually recruited a few more JUCo and D1 transfers than the Big Sky average. But ISU has raised requirements for all its recruits, including JUCOs, and that has made recruiting that much tougher.
As to NCAA requirements, as noted above, if you are a non-qualifier coming out of high school, you must get your AA from a JUCO in order to get a scholarship. If you were a qualifier, you can transfer after one season.