GreenGiant
Active member
Do we even care that Rountree has left for a deputy AD job, there doesn't seem to have been any kind of nation wide search. I wonder if this is a sign.
Alan said:No DavidKeys, I am not a shill for Montana. I'm a Viking fan but of the glass half empty variety. Over the years that point of view has been more than justified. My message was addressing GreenGiants question. My response was yes, I think it could be (get that could be) a sign. However, I do believe our programs are in trouble due to a poor records, terrible attendance and the subsequent lack of revenue. I hope our new President and AD can find a way to turn the ship around. I am not hopeful.
bigskyconf said:Alan said:No DavidKeys, I am not a shill for Montana. I'm a Viking fan but of the glass half empty variety. Over the years that point of view has been more than justified. My message was addressing GreenGiants question. My response was yes, I think it could be (get that could be) a sign. However, I do believe our programs are in trouble due to a poor records, terrible attendance and the subsequent lack of revenue. I hope our new President and AD can find a way to turn the ship around. I am not hopeful.
I'll admit I am not too enamored with this hiring, but I think she is more ready now for a DI AD job than she was back then (and I do think we could have done worse).
Viktorious said:bigskyconf said:Alan said:No DavidKeys, I am not a shill for Montana. I'm a Viking fan but of the glass half empty variety. Over the years that point of view has been more than justified. My message was addressing GreenGiants question. My response was yes, I think it could be (get that could be) a sign. However, I do believe our programs are in trouble due to a poor records, terrible attendance and the subsequent lack of revenue. I hope our new President and AD can find a way to turn the ship around. I am not hopeful.
I'll admit I am not too enamored with this hiring, but I think she is more ready now for a DI AD job than she was back then (and I do think we could have done worse).
At least it's not David Hersh :rofl: :?
Alan said:Yes, I think it could be a sign.
Pounder said:Should the football program fall, membership in the Big Sky Conference goes bye bye. Correct?
The WAC seems to be preparing to lose Chicago State... a school that looks like it could completely shutter, not just lose athletics. Obviously, it's a conference from which everyone is trying to get out... but probably won't since the Big 12 put the stop sign on expansion. Remaining members:
Cal State Bakersfield
Grand Canyon
Missouri-Kansas City
New Mexico State
Seattle U
Texas-Rio Grande Valley
Utah Valley
A school a bus ride from LA, a school IN Phoenix, a school IN Kansas City, a Land Grant with a D-1 history that's a short bus ride from El Paso (or longer from Albuquerque), a school IN Seattle, a school not far from South Padre Island, and a school a short bus ride from Salt Lake City.
So a possible Portland-Seattle rivalry. Several urban schools. Even a sort-of Southern California visit. I can think of worse outcomes in amongst the not-a-chance-in-the-world outcomes.
It's the instability one fears, naturally. Only problem being the realistic alternative is the GNAC.
Alan said:I'd say football is good for this year and next. Depending on the preferences of the new president, maybe more. However, program income (read attendance) had better improve if we expect to be a Division I program for the long haul. That means back to back to back great seasons like 2015, an exciting brand of play (read fill the air with footballs) and a much improved fan experience. Sitting in Providence Park with a maybe a thousand fellow fans provides little in the way of a college football atmosphere. It's just not fun. This year was an unmitigated disaster. A couple more of those and it will all be over.