superhornet
Active member
Those are some very good arguments, SD. One wonders if the CBL would take us back, but in the terms you mentioned, it does make quite a bit more sense.
Super Hornet said:Those are some very good arguments, SD. One wonders if the CBL would take us back, but in the terms you mentioned, it does make quite a bit more sense.
SactoHornetAlum said:Super Hornet said:Those are some very good arguments, SD. One wonders if the CBL would take us back, but in the terms you mentioned, it does make quite a bit more sense.
What the hell are you talking about? CBL?
DrMike said:i dont think the BigWest would have an interest in Sac, unless UOP leaves for the WCC. i would think the SoCal teams like having 2 NoCal teams here for basketball/volleyball trips. adding a third means a trip up for a single game. it would be a good fit for Sac, and a step up for sports like baseball, soccer (m/w), volleyball and softball. they would compete well in all those sports.
DrMike said:i dont think the BigWest would have an interest in Sac, unless UOP leaves for the WCC. i would think the SoCal teams like having 2 NoCal teams here for basketball/volleyball trips. adding a third means a trip up for a single game. it would be a good fit for Sac, and a step up for sports like baseball, soccer (m/w), volleyball and softball. they would compete well in all those sports.
Super Hornet said:GL: That all would make sense, but after going to all the work to rid himself of Utah State and Idaho to get to his wet dream of the Cali Bus League, it doesn't seem likely that the BW commissioner Dumb-Dumb Dennis (aka 3D) Farrell (that's what practically the entire BW fan base calls him) would allow Hawai'i to return to the Big West. There's the pie argument UOP mentioned (only so many ways to slice it), and there's the travel argument, too.
If they go back on the pie argument, the only way (in my mind, anyway) bringing Sac bac would work would be to entice San Jose back so UOP would have a more logical travel partner than Northridge or Bako.
So how is Sac State any different? Great, we added a Football/Track Fieldhouse from funds that were allocated for something bigger and better. Great, we got new turf because a semi-pro team wants to use Hornet Stadium. What else has been done aside from that that separates us from the rest of the BW members? Football can easily be dropped if we are members of the BSC or the BW, since it sounds like it depends on the president, why would conference affiliation make a difference of the longevity of the program? It’s great that we currently have a president who supports athletics, but that could change and being in the BSC vs. the BW wouldn’t save the program if it was put on the chopping block. The fact is with ever shrinking budgets coupled with rising student fees, it’s only a matter of time before people (students, faculty, staff, and media) wake up and say, “Why are we squandering money sending teams to ND, MT, AZ, UT, ID, WA, OR, and CO when we can just put them on a bus and send them to SoCal?” It is strictly a financial decision nothing more, and at the end of the day that is what will be the determining factor. I was fine with everything being in the BSC and it was great, however that all changed when the BSC allowed football only association. If being in the BSC adds some kind of financial incentives that balances the budget then fine keep it that way, otherwise this or any future administration will have to take a long hard look at the bottom line and determine which options are more sustainable for athletics as a whole.Green Cookie Monster said:The BW should be called the Big Apathetic Conference.
Every school in that league is happy being a ho-hum 'we have sports' institution.
Doesnt surprise me that media coverage is lacking in the BW. I know some people have a woody about joining, but I think it would be a step backwards as then it suddenly becomes vogue to drop your football program. Remember, Gonzo isnt going to be here forever and we need a league that supports football.
Kayak. :lol:Fajadadu said:If U of H joins the Big West (AKA the CBL) does that mean that as a cash strapped program the Farm Extension they would have to ride a bus to Hawaii?
Green Cookie Monster said:The BW should be called the Big Apathetic Conference.
Every school in that league is happy being a ho-hum 'we have sports' institution.
Doesnt surprise me that media coverage is lacking in the BW. I know some people have a woody about joining, but I think it would be a step backwards as then it suddenly becomes vogue to drop your football program. Remember, Gonzo isnt going to be here forever and we need a league that supports football.
BKCheer said:Pacific does compete in non-big west sports and is paid a percentage by the conference (mostly from Basketball winnings) to assist in the financing of non-revenue generating sports. Pacific picks up the rest of the tab, especially for coaches and players on not-Fully Funded teams.
If Sac were to come in the total amount of money the conference gives out doesn't change (not a whole bunch. The budget is...the budget, Unless increase revenues are realized. This of course ignores and is excluding travel, health and course fees picked up by the conference because that's another budget and another mess because it just makes less available for the students).
It's that an additional share would make make all shares lower i.e. let's say it's 10 mill and 9 teams to start and then it goes to 10 mil and 10 teams. Your share goes from 1.11 mil to 1 mil. Basically you now have 110,000 less money to fund your other teams.
So if you think you are giving up money (share) then what value can replace that? New or expanded revenues (more advancing teams), more media revenues and better exposre (throw "market" and merchandising into this).
Sac (currently) does none of this. Consider that Sac, the second they join hurts our conference without adding any benifits. Their joining would actually make it harder for us to get two teams in.
Current Sagarian Ratings
Big West Ratings:
17 BIG WEST = 70.24 70.44 ( 17) TEAMS= 9 70.42 ( 17)
College Basketball 2010-2011 Starting Ratings
HOME ADVANTAGE= 3.86 RATING
108 Pacific = 76.63
139 UC Santa Barbara = 73.95
167 Long Beach State = 72.10
177 CS Fullerton = 71.31
185 CS Northridge = 70.94
227 UC Irvine = 68.35
241 UC Riverside = 67.25
249 Cal Poly-SLO = 66.72
250 UC Davis = 66.70
321 Sacramento State = 61.15