DustRunner
Active member
Agreed. The DJ thing just does not work, and there's something lacking when the team comes out and there is no Fight Song played (not that I like it that much, but hey, it's better than silence).
And at least the logos were back on the helmets, which was nice.
About the game:
Overthrown passes: Both teams were jittery early. However, those catches could have made the game more of a rout than it was.
Better Crowd: At least there was somewhat of a student section last night. Biggest one I've ever been a part of (given that it was nonexistant last year). However, a good half of them left after halftime, so the end crowd really wasn't that large.
Penalties: Actually, most of the PI calls against us were warranted; you just cannot grab a receiver or tackle him before he can catch the ball. However, the last two were questionable, and those were the ones that could have cost us the game.
A Tale of Two Halves: We shut down NAU's running game for most of the contest, making them throw the ball. They then proceeded to shred us through the air (almost converting on a Third-and-Thirty Three proves my point). WE just couldn't stop their passing attack, which theoretically wasn't supposed to burn us that badly. When we went into time-kill mode, they ran the ball more and got more yardage. However, we prevented the big play (which is what we failed to do last year against Montana in that defeat last season), and that's what hurt NAU in the end.
Problems Down the Road: Say Cory being out of the game occurs, like last night. What do we do? NAU stuffed our running game when we were trying to kill the clock, obviously because we were in that situation but also because CK didn't scare them through the air, and our running backs who were playing just didn't have the openings to run through (since Cory seems to find even the smallest seams to run through). If opposing defenses don't have to respect our passing attack, then they can stuff the run without us being able to compensate. A one-dimensional offense doesn't win many games.
Our defense needs to step up. Was moving Shead to safety a bad idea? They were great against the run, but the pass was killing us. Better work on that before we go into a game where our opponents like to pass instead of run the ball.
We're going to TCU next week. Hopefully we can look respectable, but it's going to be harsh in the end. However, TCU hasn't exactly looked like they did last season (they spotted UL Monroe 17 points yesterday in the first half, so I'd like to think that if the Warhawks can do that much damage, that we can score some points). Also, losing to Baylor in the first week shows that maybe they aren't as good as advertised. Maybe, if we can get those passes completed and have Cory running the ball effectively, then we have a chance, although extremely slim, to beat them in Fort Worth.
And at least the logos were back on the helmets, which was nice.
About the game:
Overthrown passes: Both teams were jittery early. However, those catches could have made the game more of a rout than it was.
Better Crowd: At least there was somewhat of a student section last night. Biggest one I've ever been a part of (given that it was nonexistant last year). However, a good half of them left after halftime, so the end crowd really wasn't that large.
Penalties: Actually, most of the PI calls against us were warranted; you just cannot grab a receiver or tackle him before he can catch the ball. However, the last two were questionable, and those were the ones that could have cost us the game.
A Tale of Two Halves: We shut down NAU's running game for most of the contest, making them throw the ball. They then proceeded to shred us through the air (almost converting on a Third-and-Thirty Three proves my point). WE just couldn't stop their passing attack, which theoretically wasn't supposed to burn us that badly. When we went into time-kill mode, they ran the ball more and got more yardage. However, we prevented the big play (which is what we failed to do last year against Montana in that defeat last season), and that's what hurt NAU in the end.
Problems Down the Road: Say Cory being out of the game occurs, like last night. What do we do? NAU stuffed our running game when we were trying to kill the clock, obviously because we were in that situation but also because CK didn't scare them through the air, and our running backs who were playing just didn't have the openings to run through (since Cory seems to find even the smallest seams to run through). If opposing defenses don't have to respect our passing attack, then they can stuff the run without us being able to compensate. A one-dimensional offense doesn't win many games.
Our defense needs to step up. Was moving Shead to safety a bad idea? They were great against the run, but the pass was killing us. Better work on that before we go into a game where our opponents like to pass instead of run the ball.
We're going to TCU next week. Hopefully we can look respectable, but it's going to be harsh in the end. However, TCU hasn't exactly looked like they did last season (they spotted UL Monroe 17 points yesterday in the first half, so I'd like to think that if the Warhawks can do that much damage, that we can score some points). Also, losing to Baylor in the first week shows that maybe they aren't as good as advertised. Maybe, if we can get those passes completed and have Cory running the ball effectively, then we have a chance, although extremely slim, to beat them in Fort Worth.