Well-run collegiate sports programs enhance faculty, student, alumni, and community engagement and alignment; they increase the value of the university brand; they drive enrollment and academic excellence; and they drive revenue for other auxiliaries (e.g., athletic paraphernalia sales). Multiple studies have shown alumni athletes donate more often and more dollars than non-athletes.
The student athlete is a truly exceptional individual. NCAA data demonstrate that the percentage of high school athletes who end up being able to compete at the collegiate level is very low (depending on the sport, between 3.3 and 11.3 percent). So sports programs allow us to attract truly exceptional young people to our universities, many of whom are of diverse or under-represented backgrounds and who serve as role models for our under-represented and majority student populations alike.
So, yes, let’s shine a bright light on problems in collegiate athletics, and let’s institute necessary reforms. Let’s ensure we always put the good of our student athletes first. But let’s not overreact and lose the tremendous potential collegiate sports hold for universities and students alike. We shouldn’t be throwing the baby out with the bathwater.
boisebengal said:It certainly seems like Dr. Wight would be the favorite to lead the university, when you look at his wealth of experience he's had at Weber. But why would he want to be president at ISU after holding the same position at Weber? Looks like a lateral move to me.