I don't see a lot of haters. I hated the process, but I'm optimistic about the pick. Both Lewis Clark State and ISU named their presidents yesterday. That seems silly to me - certainly they could have staggered the process by a couple weeks or so, rather than say they were bogged down. The provost position down at USU has remained open, and after some candidates dropped out (ahem, Woodworth-Ney), they added additional finalists.
Now that said, I went back last night and watched Saterlee's forum with student leaders. I liked that forum better than the one he had with faculty and the later one with the community. He was very direct and realistic. Had I watched that forum earlier, he would have been my solid #2 pick behind Wight. Experience and track record carries a lot of weight for me.
There is a faction of faculty/staff/alumni who are never going to be satisfied with the pick. I get that. They have predicted doom for ISU, and they go out of their way, no matter what, to blast anything coming out of ISU. Presidents of universities aren't a "pure" academic choice anymore; that is, they aren't necessarily professors who ventured into the administration side. Many universities have hired CEO's to lead them. Higher education is constantly evolving and changing. bSu's prez was a politician, for crying out loud.
Like PBP, I think a fresh pair of eyes and philosophy is badly needed. I like that the athletic department has to be on their toes, because I think W-N would have meant business as usual. I like that Satterlee has worked with bSu athletics. I like that he was at bSu when CWI came to fruition. I like that he knows the state board of education and the state officials. I like that he has talked about going to major employers in the area to talk about what they are looking for in ISU grads.
So yeah, no hate. Didn't like the process, but I wish Satterlee nothing but luck. Like some of the candidates said in their forums - some of ISU's problems aren't unique to ISU. They are solvable.