• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

Poll: Do You Want UM To Leave?

Should UM move up?

  • yes, they should leave the big sky

    Votes: 10 45.5%

  • no, they should stay

    Votes: 12 54.5%
  • Total voters
    22
catcat said:
i would think if only fcs are added to the current wac 6 that usu could be a new power (lol). what about hawaii, will they really go indepedent or stay? anyone know? bulla, u still on here? what about la tech? i dont like the idea really of losing teams because i dont want any DII's to join.

i keep hearing sac, psu, um are candidates along with poly and davis. how do we know who is really on the wac's list. assuming there will be a wac.

it would suck to not have the montanas in the big sky but trying to in a football title becomes easier. as well it would affect basketball somewhat. UM is top 3 about every year on the hardwood much like we are.

there are no teams we have played more in basketball in the nation in our history than UM/MSU/ISU - every year since 1963.
Click to expand...

From a football perspective, the only good candidates for moving "up" would be Montana, and to a lesser extent Montana State, due to acceptable FBS football attendance averages of 24,417, and 13,283.
 
You have to be kidding. Montana would not have 5-6 losses per year. The way the WAC will be configured, they will be fighting for the top position with U of Idaho, Hawaii, or Ut State. None of the other teams would be good enough to invite to the Big Sky let alone be a challenge for Montana. Let them go if they want to be in a league that is more irrelevant in football than the Big Sky :lol: :lol:
 
What a "wonderful" thing to rise to....being rated right next to USU and U of I! Would they be willing to give up an annual trip to the playoffs(17 straight and counting) and chance at a legit Nat'l Championship or would they aspire to a trip to the Humanitarian Bowl once every 3 or 4 years?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top