• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!

Private developer wants to build "urban village" at CSUS

StungAlum

Active member
Private developer wants to build "urban village" on CSUS campus
By Bob Shallit
[email protected]
Published: Friday, May. 1, 2009 - 11:44 am
Last Modified: Friday, May. 1, 2009 - 12:14 pm
Harvard Square in Sacramento? Under an unprecedented proposal that's been been quietly brewing for months, a private developer would build a $300-to-500 million "urban village" of housing, shops, restaurants and offices on the CSUS campus.

The proposal, which envisions construction paid for entirely by the developer, is drawing intense interest from university and city officials.

The proposal was submitted last fall by national developer Clark Realty Capital of Arlington, Va., and has been the topic of high-level, hush-hush discussions since then.

Many consider it a make-or-break opportunity for Sac State to transform itself from a commuter school into a vibrant, 24-hour campus.

CSUS President Alexander Gonzalez tells us Clark's proposal could potentially advance the goal of making Sac State a "destination" university. But "we're really just beginning the discussion ... to see what this brings the university." To go forward, the plan would need approval by the CSU board of trustees.

City officials, meanwhile, are downright ecstatic about the project, which could start construction as early as 2012.

Assistant City Manager John Dangberg says it would establish an "exciting Harvard Square-type" urban grid near the campus' southern entrance along Highway 50, while spurring investment to the city's redevelopment area around Folsom Boulevard and 65th Street, west of the campus.

Dangberg and others say it also could build momentum for a nearby "technology village" where private companies would work with faculty and students to develop and commercialize breakthroughs in clean energy, biomedicine and other emerging technologies.

It could also help Sac State become "one of the best campuses in the CSU system" and draw the "best and brightest" students from across the country, says Alan Porter, a senior city planner who has been one the key participants in discussions.

Clark's willingness to shoulder the construction costs and share lease revenues from the university village is a big part of the project's appeal. Under its proposal, the company would secure a long-term lease for between six and 18 acres of mostly unused land between Folsom Boulevard and University Drive West. It would spend up to $500 million building student housing, shops, entertainment venues and other amenities - then share resulting revenues with the university.

That's the model Clark has used on military bases, says William Hamilton, the Clark development executive who proposed the Sacramento project. It would, he says, give CSUS officials "the village they've long wanted, at no cost, and they also get a revenue stream."

Hamilton, a Roseville native who now works out of Clark's San Diego office, says he's always wanted to do a landmark project in his hometown. This one, he says, would be a "thriving, vibrant village" designed to enhance the university experience for students and faculty and give alumni a reason to return to campus.

"Most great universities have that," he says. "But it's something CSUS sorely lacks."


http://www.sacbee.com/latest/story/1826936.html

In the comments section of the Bee on this article, there is a lot of Sac State bashing!
 
Pretty ambitious project, but a tremendous opportuinity for the campus and community. If it pans out right, it could really liven up the area around campus.

StungAlum said:
In the comments section of the Bee on this article, there is a lot of Sac State bashing!
I often cringe before checking out the comments section on newspaper articles. It's so easy to whine with one's keyboard. Someone could find an all-in-one cure for cancer, AIDS, and swine flu, and people would still find something to compain about! :)
 
Pretty interesting...though I would have to see what the more specific plans are...because at this point it is really vague.
 
I’m a little hesitant to this idea. There is something that bothers me about an outside/non-university entity coming on campus and raping the campus and students for profit. I would think if the university really wanted to pursue this, they could get it going and this would keep most, if not all of the profit within the university. Granted it’s not easy to raise $500 mil for a project so I understand why they are pursuing this “partnership”.
If this company wanted to build something on the south side, why not just buy out that dive bar (“The Library” when I was there) and junk yard right across the street from campus. Why hand over valuable campus acreage so a private firm can get rich off of it.
No one goes to the south side of campus anyways. The only thing down there is a bunch of faculty offices, and the campus radio station that no one listens to. The dorms are on the complete opposite side of campus so unless a significant amount of housing would be added, I don’t see this plan being nothing more than a glorified on-campus strip mall. I thought the future plan for the area south of the stadium was to add another parking garage?
 
The article says 'entertainment', which could mean a new arena or a new movie theatre.

The businesses across from the railroad tracks are an eyesore, why not buy these out and build there as noted. I would like to see a Greek row too. What about the Ramona land that was just purchased? I am sure the wheels have fallen off that project given the economy.

It would also be nice to have the railroad tracks scrapped. Are those tracks still used?

When is an announcement expected? No mention in the upcoming trustee meeting.
http://www.calstate.edu/bot/agendas/may09/CPBG.pdf

If they build new student housing they could make the dorms on the north end of campus specific; honors, freshmen, etc.
 
It sounds like Cal Poly already has something similar.


Editorial: Urban campus to urban village
Published: Tuesday, May. 5, 2009 - 12:00 am | Page 14A
http://www.sacbee.com/opinion/story/1833558.html

Leaders at California State University, Sacramento, have set an ambitious goal to transform the university into a residential, destination campus.

As part of that, they have asked the important question: "Is it possible to create a 'college town' in the middle of a large metropolitan city?"

The answer is yes – with the right mix of interest and persistence from the university, city and a private developer.

In fact, with the university's Destination 2010 plan and the city's 2030 General Plan and specific area plans, leaders of both town and gown have committed to the idea of a mini-downtown.

These plans call for housing and retail centered around the Sacramento State campus and the 65th Street light-rail station. They also include easy pedestrian and bike access.

And it's all starting to come together. The university is beginning to be a hub in the area, visible from Highway 50.

For example, at the corner of 65th Street and Folsom Boulevard, you can now see shops and loft apartments for more than 300 students. These are close to the Hornet Tunnel, which brings students under the Union Pacific railroad tracks to campus in a short four-minute walk.

And, at today's meeting, City Council members will consider a $7 million, 32-unit housing and commercial project on a site just over 2 acres in size near 65th Street and Broadway, close to Highway 50 and the 65th Street light-rail station.

Developer Mike Klein has proposed a 2,900-square-foot retail building fronting 65th Street, topped by two apartments. Behind it would be 10 row houses. Farther back on the 2-acre lot would be 24 single-family homes, similar to those built in east Sacramento in the 1930s. The houses would be clustered around a small park with a landscaped pedestrian pathway.

Unfortunately, some neighborhood residents oppose the project and have sent petitions asking the council "please, please do not issue permits for the development of the property." They fear added traffic on 65th Street. The Department of Transportation, however, has reviewed the proposal and says it will not "result in a significant impact" on traffic – generating 35 car trips in the morning peak hour and 65 car trips in the afternoon peak hour.

In fact, the location and design of this project aim to support transit ridership and reduce auto dependence.

The council should approve this project. The planning commission already has unanimously approved it, and city staff recommend it.

Then the city can get to work on pinning down details for a much more ambitious project – a $300 million to $500 million "urban village" of housing, shops, restaurants and offices on the Sacramento State campus itself — between Folsom Boulevard and State University Drive South.

National developer Clark Realty Capital of Arlington, Va., which recently built a successful urban village on the California Polytechnic State University campus in San Luis Obispo, is in talks with Sacramento State.

It is indeed possible to create a college town in the middle of Sacramento. It's happening, slowly but surely. These projects, with the university as a hub, are especially timely now. They can be a key part of bringing new energy to Sacramento – providing a stimulus to help reverse the economic downturn.
 
Green Cookie Monster said:
The businesses across from the railroad tracks are an eyesore, why not buy these out and build there as noted. I would like to see a Greek row too. What about the Ramona land that was just purchased? I am sure the wheels have fallen off that project given the economy.

It would also be nice to have the railroad tracks scrapped. Are those tracks still used?

I doubt getting rid of the businesses across the railroad tracks is possible or cheap. And I think there may be a plan in the future to expand Folsom Blvd to two lanes each way when it goes under the railroad tracks so that will impact that area a little.
A Greek row would definitely add to the “college town” theme but I would think any established residential neighborhoods in the area would be strongly opposed to it.
Last I heard the Ramona land was going to be used to build a faculty housing tract or something. I don’t know if Sac State carried on with that plan. It was used as overflow parking when they were building the huge parking structure.
The railroad tracks are still heavily used and I am sure there is absolutely no chance at having them scrapped.

In fact, the location and design of this project aim to support transit ridership and reduce auto dependence.

:lol: :lol: :lol:
 
I haven't commented because I wanted to learn more about this and see if something close to this, has happened at other schools.

I have no problem with the school basically donating the land to this developer. The school doesn't have the money to develop that land. So if somebody is willing to build something that could make money for the school, why shouldn't we at least look into the idea.

I would make sure that our arena gets build and we have design control, as part of this deal. If we give the developer design control, he may build the arena on the cheap.

I think any "Urban Village" should benefit students first, then the surrounding community. If this area becomes the place to go on weekends for the surrounding area, I think that's a great idea.

I would like to know more about this before saying I'm 100% behind this idea. But this looks very promising. I just hope this developer is the real deal and has a solid background on building projects, on time and on budget.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top