• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

Quarterfinals vs. UC Davis Game Day Thread

Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?
 
Next half -

On offense, run the ball until they can stop it. Work the play action to the TE’s. We probably need to figure out a way to get the ball to Webster too.

On defense, take away run the run and make them one dimensional.
 
30 minute game now... can only shake my head at the bizarro play calling. Davis can't cover all our WR's, stop the run or pressure EB3 (unless he just stands there for 5 seconds)... so just what the hell is going on?
 
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

Much more concerning is the fact that we’re +3 in turnovers and tied. To me that says the offense isn’t getting it done.
 
Seattle Eagle said:
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

Much more concerning is the fact that we’re +3 in turnovers and tied. To me that says the offense isn’t getting it done.

Offense definitely isn't getting it done. Line is being leaky and it's making us one dimensional.
 
Seattle Eagle said:
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

Much more concerning is the fact that we’re +3 in turnovers and tied. To me that says the offense isn’t getting it done.

This. The offense definitely feels like they have been figured out by the Aggies D, for the most part. Barriere can't seem to find any open receivers downfield. The running game is working decently, but that second scoring drive required three straight passing plays to a TE. Glad to see it work, but it would be awesome to know we can still have an explosive passing game. I know we have great receivers, is Barriere just not seeing the routes develop as quickly as Gubrud did?
 
dudeitsaid said:
Seattle Eagle said:
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

Much more concerning is the fact that we’re +3 in turnovers and tied. To me that says the offense isn’t getting it done.

This. The offense definitely feels like they have been figured out by the Aggies D, for the most part. Barriere can't seem to find any open receivers downfield. The running game is working decently, but that second scoring drive required three straight passing plays to a TE. Glad to see it work, but it would be awesome to know we can still have an explosive passing game. I know we have great receivers, is Barriere just not seeing the routes develop as quickly as Gubrud did?

We'll figure it out in the second half and put up points.
 
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

The play calling has been suspect. Their defensive front 7 is small and I cannot for the life of me figure out why we aren't running straight at them more often. I hope they figure some things out next quarter because as it stands our offense hasn't shown it's capable of winning this game. I think we are going to need a couple of big plays on defense to create some separation in this one. Fingers crossed.
 
Seattle Eagle said:
luckyintheorder said:
Well, just looking at "explosiveness" aka yds per play; Davis is winning by nearly 2 yds per play more which translates to an 89% chance of winning the game... it doesn't feel that way though, does it?

Much more concerning is the fact that we’re +3 in turnovers and tied. To me that says the offense isn’t getting it done.
The same data on TO's says plus 3 is a 79% chance of winning the game... So all things considered this is still a push. Ridiculous from where I sit in my comfortable chair in a heated environment with homemade chicken soup about to be served.. Go Eags. Finish!
 

Latest posts

Back
Top