BLACKFALKIN1
Active member
LDopaPDX said:I think it's well past the "fact-finding" stage, and sounds like it is now putting together a pitch to gather donations. Eastern is actively prpeparing marketing to hit the street and giving a proposal to the Board of Regents (or Trustees or whatever the hell they call it) to secure university funding. I guess one large donor from the Willamette Valley and a couple from the Westside are already onboard.
Just to be clear, I have NOT seen blueprints... I think I may have not said that correctly earlier, but they do exist and are being shown to fundraisers. What is included is a new two-tiered Eastside structure that will have a bulding facade on one side and the stadium seating on the other. The stadium will be "compressed" versus the current incarnation and the track will be removed allowing seating right up to the field surface.
University funding is being sought to cover the removal of the track and relocation to a new venue atop the current practice fields. I'm not sure what plans for seating exist up there, maybe they could move the current Eastside temps, who knows. I guess the field can be relaid without much prep? I was unclear on that.
The final project will amount to 14,000- 15,000 seats. That will still include the structure at the end of the North endzone. Mark Hughes is the guy largely spearheading this. The only real hitch that could unhinge the project is him leaving Eastern... and we all know plans have a way of falling apart quickly at EWU. I think a public announcement will be in store for the Spring, as that's when the proposal will be sent to the University for public financial support. I have no idea on an estimated completion date, but my understanding is that this is a "sooner" rather than "later" project and beginning at the end of next season is likely.
Great to hear. If theyre gonna upgrade the eastside, the may as well do the south endzone like they did the north endzone. But still great to hear. Lopa who/what are your sources? or at least tell us how reliable are the source(s)? 50%? 100%? :thumb: