• Hi Guest,

    We've updated the site to combine all the forums that were part of the Big Sky Fans Network into one location. This will make it easier to navigate and participate in all the discussions for each school without having to have multiple accounts, etc. We are still working out some tweaks but please let us know if you notice anything.

    With the migration, in some circumstances, your username could have been merged with one of your other usernames from the other forums. If this is the case, you can request to change your username in your account details page of your profile.
  • Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your eGriz.com experience today!
  • Guest, do want an ad free experience on BigSkyFans.com among other benefits? Upgrade your account today!

    Simply click your profile name > account upgrades > BigSky Club > choose between the year long subscription (two free months) or month to month

    Thanks for the continued support. Cheers!

Seasons Done...final thoughts, and next year.

I agree 100%.

I think Weber is well positioned for the future! its just going to take some time to get the bad taste out of our mouth from this season!
 
Midmajor?? said:
I agree 100%.

I think Weber is well positioned for the future! its just going to take some time to get the bad taste out of our mouth from this season!


And a point guard (a real point guard)
 
sacstateman said:
... what you really need is to find a point guard who can give you 10 pts and 6 assists per game.......then you can move Senglin where he belongs...

the BSC is and always will be a guard dominated league...

Point #1: Agree.

Point #2: Maybe so, but Weber was worked at both ends of the floor in the paint this season. The two teams playing to dance were both solid with their bigs.
 
SWWeatherCat said:
sacstateman said:
... what you really need is to find a point guard who can give you 10 pts and 6 assists per game.......then you can move Senglin where he belongs...

the BSC is and always will be a guard dominated league...

Point #1: Agree.

Point #2: Maybe so, but Weber was worked at both ends of the floor in the paint this season. The two teams playing to dance were both solid with their bigs.

Our issue is inside! We need a competent 5! Yes olds, I don't agree that bigs are interchangeable. I think Rahe made a huge error moving Bolomboy to the 5 spot. We recruit guards like crazy, but we need bigs that can contribute!
 
Cats meow! said:
SWWeatherCat said:
sacstateman said:
... what you really need is to find a point guard who can give you 10 pts and 6 assists per game.......then you can move Senglin where he belongs...

the BSC is and always will be a guard dominated league...

Point #1: Agree.

Point #2: Maybe so, but Weber was worked at both ends of the floor in the paint this season. The two teams playing to dance were both solid with their bigs.

Our issue is inside! We need a competent 5! Yes olds, I don't agree that bigs are interchangeable. I think Rahe made a huge error moving Bolomboy to the 5 spot. We recruit guards like crazy, but we need bigs that can contribute!
I like to see us get back to Wildcat basketball! Yes that includes winning the battle in the paint! We can't get schooled every game in the paint! I don't knowvwhat Rahe is thinking, but whatever he tried this year didn't work! Going to see how he responds to his first losing season! Hopefully with fire!
 
I don't think that the 4s and 5s are always interchangeable either, unless you have twin towers that are both mobile. I just said that in Rahe's system it is easier to move between the 4 and the 5 than it is between the 4 and the 3. The roles in the offense are just too different between the 4 and the 3. Some players can do it, but Hill struggled with it. Bolomboy never did transition to the 5 like they thought he would. It will help him a lot, having Braxton playing along side him next year. I also believe that Senglin will prove to be a much better point guard than anyone thinks next year. :twocents:
 
Senglin will have a massive year at the PG spot...... the team won't do well, but Senglin will! Its a team game..... SAC is right. Its time to play people at the right position. Senglin is not a PG!

I know changes are coming, but how many shooting guards do we need? even with players leaving we'll have too many shooting guards! Golden, Jefferson, Richardson, (maybe Baker)...... thats a lot! What happens to Hill and Gittens if you move Bolomboy to 4? Who comes off the bench? both started and played a lot of minutes, but one of them will be coming off the bench if we go back to a bigger lineup! Whatever it is, I hope they install the offense in June versus October. I don't want to hear the excuses in December!
 
SWWeatherCat said:
sacstateman said:
... what you really need is to find a point guard who can give you 10 pts and 6 assists per game.......then you can move Senglin where he belongs...

the BSC is and always will be a guard dominated league...

Point #1: Agree.

Point #2: Maybe so, but Weber was worked at both ends of the floor in the paint this season. The two teams playing to dance were both solid with their bigs.


Point #2: EWU does not get anywhere without Harvey and Brandon, Jois is good but he doesn't carry them......Montana did use the bigs more than anyone else did but until Kryslovic started to contribute they were living and dying off their guards too....NAU basically had their bigs just play defense and rebound....and we were weak inside all year (probably our undoing).....So I guess I agree on some and disagree on others but all the teams mentioned had good guard play....

I still think you have the inside pieces you need with Braxton....plug him in and find a point and your back at the top of the conference...
 
All of the things being said about Senglin were being said about lillard at the same point in his development. Lillard's first year he was tried at point and it was a disaster. His second year was a transition year and there were still some grumblings about him being played out of position. His third year, nobody was grumbling any more and I don't hear a lot of criticism coming out of Portland right now.

Yes, Senglin came in as a tweener and it is a project for him to develop into a fulltime point. In his second year, like Lillard, he has made a lot of progress and, like lillard, that progress will continue through the spring, summer, and fall. This isn't Stockton to Malone. Rahe's offense is not set up to give one player 10+ assists per game. In his offense the assists are spread around. My feelings are that leadership is more important than anything else in the point guard position and Senglin has made big strides in that arena. :coffee:
 
oldrunner said:
All of the things being said about Senglin were being said about lillard at the same point in his development. Lillard's first year he was tried at point and it was a disaster. His second year was a transition year and there were still some grumblings about him being played out of position. His third year, nobody was grumbling any more and I don't hear a lot of criticism coming out of Portland right now.

Yes, Senglin came in as a tweener and it is a project for him to develop into a fulltime point. In his second year, like Lillard, he has made a lot of progress and, like lillard, that progress will continue through the spring, summer, and fall. This isn't Stockton to Malone. Rahe's offense is not set up to give one player 10+ assists per game. In his offense the assists are spread around. My feelings are that leadership is more important than anything else in the point guard position and Senglin has made big strides in that arena. :coffee:

The same things weren't being said by me. I never remember thinking Lillard wasn't playing in a position he could best help the team. I've wondered that all year with Senglin. It's not easy to make the comparison because Lillard was a special talent and IMO was surrounded with better teammates, with the emphasis on team. Jeremy is a great talent and may end up going down as an all-time Weber great, but he's no Lillard, especially comparing Sophomore year to Sophomore year-- Lillard made bigger strides across the board.

From an assist standpoint, I don't think Senglin is too far off of where we'd like him to be but there's a lot of factors with that too. Many recorded assists are simply because your teammates shot the ball well, not necessarily because your PG was a great facilitator. I already mentioned that I thought Lillard had better teammates surrounding him, teammates who I thought fulfilled their roles better than we saw this year. It's also difficult to compare Lillard with Senglin with assists when Lillard has always been a stronger rebounder than assist guy. Even still, Lillard was significantly better in this regard his Sophomore year.

As far as Rahe's "offense" goes, well, lets just say I have a difficult time seeing his offense and do not share in any optimism of him being able to get the most out of the talent he's had. If Senglin would benefit the team best playing the 2/wing, what would be so bad about that? If there's a better facilitator that would see the floor better as a PG, that wouldn't limit Senglin from shooting and/or driving, and maybe would create some much needed movement offensively. Leadership isn't going to amount to much if everyone is standing around. I can't be the only who who saw how much more offensive movement most opponents had. Combine that with a poor rebounding year and some spacing problems at times and it's not difficult to understand why they struggled.

We don't need Stockton-to-Malone; we don't need a 10 APG guy; but we certainly do need solid post presence, a solid facilitator, offensive movement, and a desire to rebound. The talent to do these things exists but fundamentals are missing and/or a foot in the ass to make it happen.
 
SWWeatherCat said:
oldrunner said:
All of the things being said about Senglin were being said about lillard at the same point in his development. Lillard's first year he was tried at point and it was a disaster. His second year was a transition year and there were still some grumblings about him being played out of position. His third year, nobody was grumbling any more and I don't hear a lot of criticism coming out of Portland right now.

Yes, Senglin came in as a tweener and it is a project for him to develop into a fulltime point. In his second year, like Lillard, he has made a lot of progress and, like lillard, that progress will continue through the spring, summer, and fall. This isn't Stockton to Malone. Rahe's offense is not set up to give one player 10+ assists per game. In his offense the assists are spread around. My feelings are that leadership is more important than anything else in the point guard position and Senglin has made big strides in that arena. :coffee:

The same things weren't being said by me. I never remember thinking Lillard wasn't playing in a position he could best help the team. I've wondered that all year with Senglin. It's not easy to make the comparison because Lillard was a special talent and IMO was surrounded with better teammates, with the emphasis on team. Jeremy is a great talent and may end up going down as an all-time Weber great, but he's no Lillard, especially comparing Sophomore year to Sophomore year-- Lillard made bigger strides across the board.

From an assist standpoint, I don't think Senglin is too far off of where we'd like him to be but there's a lot of factors with that too. Many recorded assists are simply because your teammates shot the ball well, not necessarily because your PG was a great facilitator. I already mentioned that I thought Lillard had better teammates surrounding him, teammates who I thought fulfilled their roles better than we saw this year. It's also difficult to compare Lillard with Senglin with assists when Lillard has always been a stronger rebounder than assist guy. Even still, Lillard was significantly better in this regard his Sophomore year.

As far as Rahe's "offense" goes, well, lets just say I have a difficult time seeing his offense and do not share in any optimism of him being able to get the most out of the talent he's had. If Senglin would benefit the team best playing the 2/wing, what would be so bad about that? If there's a better facilitator that would see the floor better as a PG, that wouldn't limit Senglin from shooting and/or driving, and maybe would create some much needed movement offensively. Leadership isn't going to amount to much if everyone is standing around. I can't be the only who who saw how much more offensive movement most opponents had. Combine that with a poor rebounding year and some spacing problems at times and it's not difficult to understand why they struggled.

We don't need Stockton-to-Malone; we don't need a 10 APG guy; but we certainly do need solid post presence, a solid facilitator, offensive movement, and a desire to rebound. The talent to do these things exists but fundamentals are missing and/or a foot in the ass to make it happen.


You are definitely on to something about being a facilitator....Hunter is a good facilitator but he is not a threat on offense.....Senglin tends to put his head down and never pass when going to the basket, not a trait a true point guard has.....He would be a darn good 2....
 
I will predict it right now. Jeremy Senglin will be back, bigger and stronger, and playing very effectively at the point guard position next year. He has been through his transition year, he knows where he needs to improve, he has a strong desire to improve, and the coaching staff will help him get there. The tactics that SUU and others used to take him out of a game will not work next year. Jeremy will resolve those issues. He is a very smart young man and is a basketball junkie. His leadership will prove to be huge for our team. We are lucky to have him for the next two years.

All of the nay sayers will be eating their words this time next year. :nod:
 
Olds...,. U have the after taste of this season in your mouth so...... You would know about eating words. There's no doubt that Senglin will come back stronger and better. The question is...... Is Weber a better team with Senglin at the point? My read is no way! We need a PG who has his head up and is looking to make passes. Not always looking to score! Yes, Dame was a shooting PG and excelled and is doing fantastic in the NBA, but how many NCAA appearances did the TEAM make under Liiliard? If we have a dominant front court next year, will we have a PG that can provide an entry pass? That's where it all starts! If you have Braxton, Bolomboy and Hill in the paint, do you clear them out and allow Senglin to "dive" into the paint? Senglin is a tremendous wildcat and will continue to grow, but if you want to dominate in the BSC..... You have to feed your bigs! Did you see how Texas A&M dominated Montana in the paint last night? They made Bruenig look human!
 
youngguns said:
Olds...,. U have the after taste of this season in your mouth so...... You would know about eating words. There's no doubt that Senglin will come back stronger and better. The question is...... Is Weber a better team with Senglin at the point? My read is no way! We need a PG who has his head up and is looking to make passes. Not always looking to score! Yes, Dame was a shooting PG and excelled and is doing fantastic in the NBA, but how many NCAA appearances did the TEAM make under Liiliard? If we have a dominant front court next year, will we have a PG that can provide an entry pass? That's where it all starts! If you have Braxton, Bolomboy and Hill in the paint, do you clear them out and allow Senglin to "dive" into the paint? Senglin is a tremendous wildcat and will continue to grow, but if you want to dominate in the BSC..... You have to feed your bigs! Did you see how Texas A&M dominated Montana in the paint last night? They made Bruenig look human!
:notworthy: :notworthy: thanks youngguns...... You just explained why last season was a bust! We got dominated inside and abandoned our team ball culture! I hope Weber goes back to playing inside out versus the individual ball we fell into this season! It's ok to have the 3 in your arsenal, but it shouldn't be the featured weapon! Senglin is going to be a man next year! No, no, Senglin is going to be THE man next year. But the team needs a distributor....... It's that simple. I think Senglin at the two and a distributor at point is the best of both worlds!
 
It would be nice if we could morph Senglin and Hunter into one awesome point guard. Olds is probably not the one to talk about eating words right now. Part of the information up thread is not correct. Kellen McCoy played point the majority of the time that Dame was a Freshman. We have to evaluate Senglin on his own merits and not compare him to Dame all of the time. I think Senglin has better talent on paper than Dame had around him. But like has been said the team element did not work out this year.
 
I actually agree with your assessments about how the team needs to change and how the point guard play needs to change. I simply feel that the team and Jeremy will make those changes. I believe that the team and coaches were and are having the same concerns that we as fans are having. Everyone has been talking about player development out of one side of their mouth and then saying that Jeremy can't develop out of the other side of their mouth. There is a bit of hypocrisy in what you are espousing.

In a perfect world your point guard comes in with all of the tools and little development is needed. We are not in that world. Year before last, our best point guard was Berry. However, we needed him more on the wing and he seldom played at the point. We also had a serviceable point guard with experience in Jordan Richardson. From the wing, Berry led our team in assists, but he seldom initiated the offense. Before you start to throw the baby out with the bath, consider where we were, where we are, and where we are going.

I believe that there is a plan in play to correct the things that went wrong this year and get us back on track next year. I believe that DEVELOPING Jeremy into a more efficient point guard is part of that plan. :coffee:
 
I think both of you are right in terms of where we need to go, but is Jeremy better for Weber as a two or an one?

If we had a strong PG, I would play Jeremy as a two, but since Jeremy is our best PG, we have to play him as an one. Cannon comes back from his mission, but we don't have a clue if he's ready to compete. He could be a great solution at the PG position, unless Hunter this summer decides he wants to be part of the offense.

We have a lot of questions this season and two major questions is what can Braxton give us at the center position and what's the best position for Jeremy. I hope we have some surprises out of the Freshman, but I'm looking more into how is Rahe going to structure this team. I'm also not sold that Hill can handle the 3 spot and if he does, what happens to Gittens? Would he be effective off the bench? Jefferson is ready to play next year too! It's going to be interesting to see who actually steps up at SG!

I expect Rahe to make some roster moves soon...... Going to be interesting to see which players move on to other programs. Golden stepped up at the end of the season and Coston had a couple of good games..... Expect to hear some announcements soon.
 
Meow;

One thing to keep in mind is that final roster decisions don't have to be made until July 1st. At least that is the way I have heard it. I don't expect any roster announcements for at least 3 or 4 weeks, maybe longer.

I don't see what good it would do for me to speculate about changes at this point. :coffee:

I agree that the point guard position seems to be Jeremy's unless someone can beat him out for it. :thumb:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top