eaglesfootball
Active member
EWURanger said:360Eag said:Check out their boards. The fans are pretty ticked about the thought of playing in the Big Sky. Apparently Big Sky football is just unwatchable.
I took a look at the site. I think a lot of the people that post on there are Johnny come lately's who never followed Idaho when they played in the Big Sky. What's funny is that Idaho had some GREAT teams back in the 80's and 90's and they produced some really great players as well. Those teams were a lot better than what they've fielded the past 10-15 years, in my opinion.
I also think there's some anecdotal evidence to suggest that success in athletics, or lack thereof, can have either a very positive or very negative overall effect on an institution. There are obviously a lot of other factors that come to play, but consider UI's current enrollment of ~11,000 students. That's around the same enrollment they had in 1996, when they left the Big Sky Conference - maybe a little more. We had a little over 8,000 students at that time. We're now close to 14,000 students, and I think athletics has played a part in that, even if we're playing FCS football.
I really think that being more competitive in football will increase student and alumni involvement. When you're winning, people come. Judging from their forum, this seems lost on most of their online fans.
does Idaho have an enrollment cap? We used to have one that was tied to state funding, but since they did away with it our enrollment has soared. Success in athletics has no doubt played a big part but so has eliminating that enrollment cap and keeping tuition lower than the other state universities.