mvem said:PBP said:Here's a little note which says something about the overall strength of the Big Sky in women's basketball.
Seven programs had winning records overall this past year, Montana St., Eastern Wash., Idaho, No. Dakota, Montana, Weber St., and Idaho State. That's out of 12 programs.
Five of the above won at least 20 games...Montana St., Eastern Wash., Idaho, Montana and Weber St.
Pretty good in my book.
PBP
If NoDak had beaten Weber in the WBI, the Big Sky would've had six 20-win teams. Still, the flat distribution/lack of any real good teams gave the league little hope of going anywhere in a major postseason tourney.
MVEN:
Even the best of Montana's teams rarely won anything in the NCAA's simply because Big Sky teams are usually seeded so low that they are always matched up against a Top 15 team nationally. The Big Sky simply doesn't have much of a chance of winning games in the NCAA's but they have done well in the WNIT.
My point being; this is a pretty damn good women's basketball league. This year for example they were ranked 19th in the RPI for all conferences out of 32. We're not talking the WAC here or the MEAC or SWAC by a long shot.
ISU alone in the past six years has beaten the following from bigger conferences, with bigger athletic budgets and usually with bigger and better athletes (on paper): Boise State (three times); Tennessee-Chattanooga (always ranked very high in the Southern Conference which is a good league); So. Florida (out of what was the Big East generally regarded at the time as the second or third best league in America); Utah State (five times); Utah (thanks to Ash Vella's monster game); Loyola Marymount and Houston.
That's not bad by anybody's standards for a Mid-Major program.
PBP