Teams like Portland State and Sac State don't even meet the minimum requirements to go to 1-A, and if they think things are tough at the 1-AA level, then wait until they try things at the 1-A level! Sounds pretty absurd to me and to most of us, I'm sure! Montana is still doing a study as to whether or not it's even feasible for them to move up. And when you look at the fact that for them it would mean increased travel costs, increased scholarships for FB -- including a lot more out of state scholarships, more sports, more coaches, more expenditures for facilities, etc. -- all for a spot in the Humanitarian Bowl!!!! They could very well just stay in the Big Sky. Everyone knew it was a huge mistake for Idaho to move up to 1-A about 15 years ago, only because BSU did. Because they're the spoiled brat, and have to have everything their way -- because of their arrogance. And soon they'll be paying the price for their foolishness! The Idaho fans well remember when BSU competed at the Jr. College level in the 50's and 60's, when Idaho was the major school in the state and were competing in the old Pac-10 conference -- whatever it was called back then. And back in the late 60's they tried to keep BSU out when they wanted to join the Big Sky. About 20 years ago I well remember when the State Board, heavily comprised of Idaho graduates, had fired BSU's President Kaiser, because he wanted to the school to move up to 1-A, and the Board didn't want them to leave Idaho behind. The Idaho folks have done everything they can to try to keep up with BSU and the success they've had at their current level, and there's certainly been a lot of jealousy on their part -- but they probably now know that it's a foregone conclusion.
Within the next few years I could very well see the Big Sky staying the same; we'll be fine and won't have any problems. It's the WAC that could soon be on life support -- because there's few options for them. La. Tech is waiting to go into the Conf. USA whenever there's an opening, and NMSU could go back into the Sun Belt. I don't know what will happen with USU, and in a way I feel for them because they're an excellent school with fine facilities and an outstanding basketball tradition. If BYU decides to stay put in the MWC then they'll be at 11 teams, and then they could add USU to be at 12.
But we'll add Idaho if they want to come crawling back with their tail between their legs, because we'd enjoy the competition with them once again. Sounds like Idaho's only options within the next few years could be to compete as a football independent, which would be financial suicide, drop their program, or come back to the Big Sky. You know, I really hope that either of the latter two options would happen. I don't like the attitude that the Idaho fans have towards ISU and the Big Sky -- when they should have been competing in the Big Sky all along.