After viewing the online
construction of the Viking Pavilion, I wonder, I just wonder if the longer-term plan might allow for the construction of an overhanging upper bowl of seating.
The fact remains that attendance for the games is deficient. The seating has been set for 3,000, an increment level higher than the previous capacity of around 1,770. The idea here seems to be to begin with a reachable attendance goal and then hopefully build more seating when justified.
* * * * *
Parking has always been a bugaboo of inconvenience. The treatment of commuting basketball fans affects the very image of the university at large.
Valerie thinks Tri-Met is the answer. Maybe for those relatively close, but not suburbanites. Mike talks about the 12th Avenue Parking Garage being available. Okay, but wouldn't it be wise to treat the fans with a measure of appreciation, warmth and hospitality. How? Through cooperation with University Parking, provide a place of urban refuge, a designated parking area within the garage just for the game attendees, perhaps quietly reserve it up on the highest level. Provide a sense of common cause and solidarity among Viking Bball fans. Vik fans together. Good treatment of arriving basketball fans tends to attract more. Upon arrival, the feeling becomes "You made it. Here is our place of parking convenience reserved just for you, our honored Viking fans. Welcome!" Simple hospitality and consideration feels good. People are attracted to what feels good and look forward to it. What attracts more is if that hospitality parking is institutionally-sanctioned and reliably available each game. Is there rooftop parking on Parking Garage III? Establish it as part of Tradition.
Now if we can do something about
our hackneyed game announcer. He should be out calling the Pendleton Roundup, not urban university basketball games. :?
* * * * *
Bringing in a
Heath Schroyer protégé could serve an the impetus here. If Barret Peery succeeds in creating the kind of excitement as was experienced during the Heath Schroyer era, attendance will very likely increase and remain steady and constant as it was during, especially, his third year. Basketball Viks were experiencing good success and we saw many good-sized crowds show up to games.
Note also that the
design of the building is such that students using the building for other purposes will be able to peer in and witness game action as they walk past. This could add to the number of those who become interested and elect to attend.
We will also have community members who will use the facility for their own purposes who may decide that the arena is a quality collegiate sports venue and to attend games as well.
By this means, the 3,000 capacity may come to see a day when Viking basketball games become well-attended throughout the coming era, especially if the games are as fun and exciting as they were during the Heath Schroyer era. If the Viks are winning and the games become a hot ticket not only for the commuting student body but also for the surrounding community at large, the day may come when the addition of an upper bowl could become a viable mandate.
With higher demand, the capacity could then be conceivably doubled to 6,000, or nearly so. In such circumstance, being an early season ticket holder may serve to one's advantage.
If the addition of an overhanging upper bowl is structurally feasible, then this could reveal an incremental strategy in constructing the lower bowl first. A future upper bowl could then appear when justified and viable through further financing, a sensible approach for Portland State.
If indeed structurally feasible,
Build the program, build the attendance, build the seating.