Pounder said:
Does anyone else think PSU blew its wad (if not financially, perhaps in terms of "tolerance of conditions") on Jerry Glanville? I don't want to address Broadway's dreamscape except to say that PSU brought in David Hersh BECAUSE of the past, and that's getting PSU nowhere.
I agree. Pokey Allen is not going to ride his donkey down Burnside any time soon, no matter how much the city wants it. It is time to move on.
Walsh had this program to where it was competing at the top of the conference and we should have been in the playoffs in 2006 (we had the resume, we didn't have anyone to lobby for us). Had Walsh stayed for 2007, we would have been contending again (we entered 2007 ranked #13 in the preseason poll). But Glanville came in (cheap) and changed the defense. Davis came in (cheap) and changed the offense. We didn't have the athletes then to handle a sudden change on both sides, particularly going from Walsh's "boring" ball control offense to the "exciting" run and shoot. Thus started our downward slide that we really have not got out of yet. Glanville left with the worse won-lost percentage in the history of PSU football (.273, tied with Ron Stratton).
Walsh won but wasn't "showy". Glanville was showy but did not win. Now we have Burton who doesn't seem to be either. How would Jones do, I don't know. This I do know, this weekend the Ducks play Thursday and the Beavers play right before us. Our game is here in town and is also broadcast across the NW via Root. If the product is good, if we play good football, people will want to come back. If the product stinks, like against Western or Cal Poly, no one will want to come out again, regardless of the efforts of Hersh. This is the best opportunity we have to move forward.