• Hi Guest, want to participate in the discussions, keep track of read/unread posts, upgrade to remove ads and more? Create your free account and increase the benefits of your BigSkyFans.com experience today!

vs. Idaho

Well the last few posts has given me more insight. Felt bad that my prediction gave UI the win...just bummed out we aren't very good. Thus, new prediction is EWU 36 vs UI 32

giphy.gif
 
Kuttaak said:
If this was Idaho's week 1 defense versus EWU week 1 defense, the Vandals would have an advantage. Idaho's defense isn't the same as the team that held Washington State to 13 points in Week 1. They lost Aaron Kinsey likely for the year and have been awful against the pass since then. Both teams struggle against the pass, the defensive passing efficiency ranking for EWU is 87th versus 95th for Idaho even with the solid performance versus Wazzu. Neither team is great at getting to the quarterback but EWU is better with 10 sacks versus 5 for Idaho. Idaho is tied for 115th in the nation for sacks, it is almost impossible to have a solid defense when you put as little pressure on the QB as Idaho does. Neither defense is good, Idaho had some decent performances early before falling off the cliff after Kinsey was injured. EWU has been bad all year. At this point in the year I would take the mediocre to bad Eag defense over the dumpster fire defense that Idaho has thrown out there the last few weeks. I do have concerns that our offense isn't really equiped to exploit the weaknesses in the Vandal defense, if Visperas was still here we would probably be a 10+ point favorite.

Vegas has the game as basically a tossup, that isn't because EWU is better than the past few years but due to how much worse Idaho is than they have were under Eck. EWU was able to keep the score close the last two years even when Idaho was much more talented. I share your view that there aren't a lot of winnable games left, I believe there is a chance this game is competitive.
Click to expand...
Idk why its so hard for people to accept that Northern Colorado might have a good team. Montana definitely does, they have the 6th best offense in the FCS and the best in the Big Sky. Those were Idaho's last few games. I have Eastern losing to those teams too, for Montana by A LOT.

Eastern may have over performed against Idaho the past few season but they were still losses, it was still a L. Again, we barely beat a winless Portland State team at home LAST WEEK. If they were just a little more competent they would have won, Idaho is more competent.

WSU was a mess the first few weeks, they were still trying to decide on a starting QB. It definitely wasn't the team that almost beat Ole Miss last week.

Sacks are great and all and whatever defensive pass efficiency is but actual yardage and points win games. If you get a sack, then give up a 15-20 yard play, which Eastern often does, the next play it means fuck all. When I pick out those stats its cause I think they indicate whether a team will or or lose. I don't cherry pick stats because Eastern beats the other team in that category.

Idaho scores an average 26.3 ppg
Eastern scores an average 23.2 ppg

Idaho is giving up an average of 28.3 ppg
Eastern is giving up an average of 35.6 ppg

Man, this is coping so hard. I know you guys want to win I just don't see it though. I don't like to see Eastern lose either. I don't like clinging to for hope for a win against bad teams. I'm probably not going to do it much longer if they don't do something and just go be a UW or WSU fan. If this were the offense of any other year, even last year I might call it a W or even 50/50.
 
Last edited:
Kuttaak said:
If this was Idaho's week 1 defense versus EWU week 1 defense, the Vandals would have an advantage. Idaho's defense isn't the same as the team that held Washington State to 13 points in Week 1. They lost Aaron Kinsey likely for the year and have been awful against the pass since then. Both teams struggle against the pass, the defensive passing efficiency ranking for EWU is 87th versus 95th for Idaho even with the solid performance versus Wazzu. Neither team is great at getting to the quarterback but EWU is better with 10 sacks versus 5 for Idaho. Idaho is tied for 115th in the nation for sacks, it is almost impossible to have a solid defense when you put as little pressure on the QB as Idaho does. Neither defense is good, Idaho had some decent performances early before falling off the cliff after Kinsey was injured. EWU has been bad all year. At this point in the year I would take the mediocre to bad Eag defense over the dumpster fire defense that Idaho has thrown out there the last few weeks. I do have concerns that our offense isn't really equiped to exploit the weaknesses in the Vandal defense, if Visperas was still here we would probably be a 10+ point favorite.

Vegas has the game as basically a tossup, that isn't because EWU is better than the past few years but due to how much worse Idaho is than they have were under Eck. EWU was able to keep the score close the last two years even when Idaho was much more talented. I share your view that there aren't a lot of winnable games left, I believe there is a chance this game is competitive.
Click to expand...
Agreed, potentially competitive depending on which teams shows up. That said, we appear to be significantly better at home. It'll be interesting to see if the bye week helped at all, or just "put us to sleep."
 
Atomic Eagle said:
Agreed, potentially competitive depending on which teams shows up. That said, we appear to be significantly better at home. It'll be interesting to see if the bye week helped at all, or just "put us to sleep."
Click to expand...
With a bye week, I can only imagine what wild trick play we will run on our second possession... Double reverse flea flicker that gets picked off? 2 QB's with a direct snap to a RB? I have us as 2TD dogs this weekend.
 
Eagle Eyes said:
With a bye week, I can only imagine what wild trick play we will run on our second possession... Double reverse flea flicker that gets picked off? 2 QB's with a direct snap to a RB? I have us as 2TD dogs this weekend.
Click to expand...
I can see this since Taylor is not on the two deep this week. Schakel lined up as WO to the left and Bell as WO to the right. Yetts behind center with Landon Cooper lined up next to him as the full back. Yetts takes the snap, fakes to run behind Cooper to the right, pitches to Bell as he sprints left. Bell then pitches to Schakel as he runs to the right. Schakel throws to a wide open Ulm, who deflects the ball off his hands into UofI defender in the end zone for a touch back.

Kidding aside, hope Taylor is okay since he is not listed on the two deep this week. Also, not sure why I didn't notice this before, but Misa is listed at DE instead of LB.

Assuming Dotson has a season ending injury as well. He hasn't recorded a stat since the first game.

Good thing is DaJean Wells is listed as a starter.

I was hoping Joshua Wood would not be back this week for Idaho as QB, but he is listed as the number one. Also, their number one RB, Elisha Cummings, is back as well. With that said, I'm going with UofI 45 EWU 24, with EWU scoring late.
 
EagSpectator said:
I can see this since Taylor is not on the two deep this week. Schakel lined up as WO to the left and Bell as WO to the right. Yetts behind center with Landon Cooper lined up next to him as the full back. Yetts takes the snap, fakes to run behind Cooper to the right, pitches to Bell as he sprints left. Bell then pitches to Schakel as he runs to the right. Schakel throws to a wide open Ulm, who deflects the ball off his hands into UofI defender in the end zone for a touch back.

Kidding aside, hope Taylor is okay since he is not listed on the two deep this week. Also, not sure why I didn't notice this before, but Misa is listed at DE instead of LB.

Assuming Dotson has a season ending injury as well. He hasn't recorded a stat since the first game.

Good thing is DaJean Wells is listed as a starter.

I was hoping Joshua Wood would not be back this week for Idaho as QB, but he is listed as the number one. Also, their number one RB, Elisha Cummings, is back as well. With that said, I'm going with UofI 45 EWU 24, with EWU scoring late.
Click to expand...
I almost went with Ulm dropping the flea flicker, lol. Not good with U of I's two better offensive players back, Best will be taking his visor off and rubbing his head a lot for this one. We might be more than 3 TD dogs...
 
Nice EagSpectator just said "At practice I saw Schakel lined up as WO to the left and Bell as WO to the right. Yetts behind center with Landon Cooper lined up next to him as the full back. Yetts takes the snap, fakes to run behind Cooper to the right, pitches to Bell as he sprints left. Bell then pitches to Schakel as he runs to the right. Schakel throws to a wide open Ulm.
***I know for a fact two of Idaho's coaching staff regularly visit this message board and believe one is masquerading as an Eagle fan with some eagle moniker. He trashes EWU's team and coaching staff(that narrows it down). Thanks to EagSpectator there's a good chance they will be aware of this play...now. Prolly need Ranger to launch an investigation to root out the operative.

s-l400.jpg
 
Obzerver said:
Nice EagSpectator just said "At practice I saw Schakel lined up as WO to the left and Bell as WO to the right. Yetts behind center with Landon Cooper lined up next to him as the full back. Yetts takes the snap, fakes to run behind Cooper to the right, pitches to Bell as he sprints left. Bell then pitches to Schakel as he runs to the right. Schakel throws to a wide open Ulm.
***I know for a fact two of Idaho's coaching staff regularly visit this message board and believe one is masquerading as an Eagle fan with some eagle moniker. He trashes EWU's team and coaching staff(that narrows it down). Thanks to EagSpectator there's a good chance they will be aware of this play...now. Prolly need Ranger to launch an investigation to root out the operative.

s-l400.jpg
Click to expand...
I'm sure they'll fuck it up in game. As if a RB under center and two QBs lined up at receiver doesn't scream trick play.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Latest posts

Back
Top