Miguel said:
This board is as sad and pathetic as the whole mess of an athletic program. When UNC was DII, the teams had a chance to play for actual titles, as the football team did. How many titles might the volleyball team have competed for by now at DII? But now, the fans and school settle for mediocrity, in a mediocre conference.
Moving down a division to increase winning odds sounds like "settling for mediocrity" to me. It also sounds "sad and pathetic."
This morning on ESPN.com the front-and-center story is "Duke Falls to Stephen F. Austin in Largest Upset in 15 Seasons." Duke is the big dog, the Yankees/Patriots/Alabama/etc. of NCAA men's basketball. Their coach--Coach K--was selected to coach the US Olympic team made up of NBA all-stars. Their players year after year are the best of the best. Duke came into the game ranked #1 in the nation. They had not lost a nonconference game at home in 20 years, a span of 150 games. Duke was a 27.5 point favorite to throttle SFA, a mid-major in a mediocre conference with no chance of winning the NCAA title this year.
But SFA won. And it is NATIONAL news.
I wonder how Stephen F. Austin athletes, students, and alumni feel about this. Despite their joy at slaying Goliath, the national recognition of their program and school, and the miraculous tale that will live on for generations--are some of them thinking screw all this, we should be in D2 competing for a title. Or maybe D3? We could have ten D3 titles by now!
https://www.espn.com/mens-college-basketball/story/_/id/28173079/stephen-f-austin-hands-duke-first-nonconference-loss-home-2000