scooter1
Active member
A lot of talk here (and other forums throughout the Big Sky) concerning the lack of discipline on the field with Portland State's football program. This is not a discussion that began with Nigel's tenure, because it was also an issue under Glanville as well. Coach Burton has emphatically expressed his feeling that it is not a discipline issue; perhaps we can read into this formulation that it is a decision making process that is ongoing, developing, and maturing.
When I personally hear "discipline problem" I just surmise out of control, self absorbed, narcissistic kids with little respect for the game or others. This is not (in my opinion) what we are witnessing with these young men. The penalties being administered have not been shown to be raw, uncontrolled aggression, but have occurred within the context of the game. I have myself witnessed several "late hit" penalties when it was obvious that the player accused of the infraction was in fact trying to pull back, but it was too late. Now there's no question that discipline comes into play here, recognizing in a split second what action to take, but how exactly does a coaching staff direct these outcomes without losing the "attacking" mentality necessary for defense? Is it incumbent upon the players in question to "think through" their processes rather than utilize instinct?
Regardless of how we define discipline, or lack thereof, this football team will need to find it's stride going forward without losing momentum that penalties invariably exact on the outcome.
When I personally hear "discipline problem" I just surmise out of control, self absorbed, narcissistic kids with little respect for the game or others. This is not (in my opinion) what we are witnessing with these young men. The penalties being administered have not been shown to be raw, uncontrolled aggression, but have occurred within the context of the game. I have myself witnessed several "late hit" penalties when it was obvious that the player accused of the infraction was in fact trying to pull back, but it was too late. Now there's no question that discipline comes into play here, recognizing in a split second what action to take, but how exactly does a coaching staff direct these outcomes without losing the "attacking" mentality necessary for defense? Is it incumbent upon the players in question to "think through" their processes rather than utilize instinct?
Regardless of how we define discipline, or lack thereof, this football team will need to find it's stride going forward without losing momentum that penalties invariably exact on the outcome.