Why? We offer baseball, softball, VB, soccer, tennis, golf and bball. Wouldn’t Pac be more interested in full membership?Pure speculation, but seems like there is some steam building behind Sacramento State as a football only PAC-12 invitee????
Pure speculation, but seems like there is some steam building behind Sacramento State as a football only PAC-12 invitee????
Agree, it's just weird to see how the cycle of rumors goes.... It was announced this AM that CBS secured the media rights for the PAC. This makes sense considering the "basketball conference" mentality it will have.It's probably just click bait. Agree about hoops sucking for so long as the PAC will be a power hoops conference going forward. If the PAC wanted Hornet football right now, a football only invite would have been issued and there wouldn't be a need for the waiver.
Interesting. MW had a contract with CBS, so looks like the PAC yanked that from the MW. Not a surprise as all the valuable MW brands will be in the PAC starting July 1, 2026.Agree, it's just weird to see how the cycle of rumors goes.... It was announced this AM that CBS secured the media rights for the PAC. This makes sense considering the "basketball conference" mentality it will have.
The biggest rumor is that Texas St. will be announced at the ninth member today. AND that there is a "mystery school" in line for a 10th member, 9th FULL member spot?
It's gotta be UTSA + Texas State.Interesting. MW had a contract with CBS, so looks like the PAC yanked that from the MW. Not a surprise as all the valuable MW brands will be in the PAC starting July 1, 2026.
Process of elimination told us that Texas State has been the obvious full 8th member for a few months ever since the PAC was unable to lure the prime AAC targets. A full 9th member is probably one of the AAC Texas schools to pair with Texas State.
It's probably just click bait. Agree about hoops sucking for so long as the PAC will be a power hoops conference going forward. If the PAC wanted Hornet football right now, a football only invite would have been issued and there wouldn't be a need for the waiver.
Agreed. While many look to Liberty as the example or pathway, Georgia State, UTSA and Old Dominion were FCS independent before their FBS transition with a conference invite. It took Georgia State 3 years before joining the Sun Belt, UTSA only one year before joining the WAC, and Over Dose U two years to CUSA. This scenario is highly likely for Sac State if they don’t pursue the legal route or if they do, it fails. Get the stadium built, have success in basketball and FCS football, and there is no reason why it still can’t happen.We're not in play for PAC membership unless there are absolutely no options on the table. PAC can add Texas State and sit tight at 8 full members until the next round of realignment in just a handful of years. We got favorable breaks how it shook out and Dr. Wood made a valiant push for an invite but a PAC invite was just too big of an ask.
The BW move for Olympic sports laid out what our near future entails. We await the final waiver vote from the D1 Council, that will more than likely be a rejection, then Dr. Wood has to go the lawfare route.
The next handful of years will be critical for the athletics in getting ready for the realignment that will hit in the beginning of the 2030's.