I always chuckle when I read comments about how Dr. Wood should be fired and lol when I see comments about how he's going over the head of the athletic director.
And some of us chuckle when you post rebuttal stuff such as this. Are you a mouthpiece for the university and Wood or an invested and concerned fan like the rest of us? It gets confusing sometimes.
I’m not sure who has stated that Wood should be fired, because that’s likely not realistic. He’s not particularly good at the job (more specifically the athletics part of it), as the results thus far confirm, but his removal is a pipe dream for the time being due to politics.
I’m also fairly confident that a fair share of the student body would also argue that he’s not particularly good at other aspects of the job, too, but I disgress.
Yes, Dr. Wood is going over the head of the athletic director because he out ranks him. Being the boss comes with certain authorities and overruling the decision/desires of the underlings is one of them. It's really that simple.
This is a rather silly take. Why hire, pay, and retain an AD position if the President is going to do the job himself? Shouldn’t the guy have enough responsibility already?
The amount of time he invests in performing the tasks of those beneath him suggests that he really doesn’t do much of anything else.
It’s one thing to be in the loop and involved in decision making of various departments under his watch, and even to rarely pull rank when necessary, but an altogether different thing to be involved at the level that he involves himself. He’s not a Billionaire owner of a professional sports franchise.
And even in those instances, the very best and most successful Billionaire owners hire people with a lot more expertise in the field (than them) then trust those people to run the operations. They are typically only involved with the financial and budgeting aspects of the decisions their AD or GM seek approval to make.
As
@Green Laser alluded, how many university presidents are following the same blueprint i.e. overriding their AD/GM’s and involving themselves in nearly every process to the same degree? How many University Presidents speak and behave as Wood does?
You’re positioning as if what he’s doing is common place. It isn’t.
If Wood doesn’t trust Mark Orr’s expertise and/or ability to perform the tasks within the purview of his job title then he should cut ties with him and hire someone else OR just cut the position altogether, save the university some money, and perform the job duties himself — in an official capacity.
There’s no need for subterfuge or maintaining the false appearance that Mark Orr is in charge of these decisions.
Edit: For those clamoring hard for Troy, if you didn't take the 2 minutes to send in an email to the admin and/or aren't buying tickets to games then please let the board know so we can discount your complaints and criticisms about how this coaching hire plays out. Thanks in advance.
What do you mean “we” can discount? You mean you. Nobody is bound by the subjective rules you’ve set forth.
I’ve bought tickets and attended many games over the decades and in recent years. But if others haven’t — so what?
If they invest themselves in any way, shape, or form as a fan — whether that be watching on TV, buying merchandise, or whatever — they have just as much right as you and I do to vent, complain, and criticize.
As for your lame email requirement — it is and was a complete waste of time. Nobody involved in the decision making process was ever going to pay it any mind. You of all people should understand that.
Any voice that Wood deems valuable enough to consider — if Wood is listening to anyone at all — has already been considered. At most that short list would be comprised of select alumni and deep pocketed donors — the latter of which is in short supply at Sac State. Hence why this university and its football program has been mired in the same situation for seemingly ever.